<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Whisky Advocate Blog &#187; Buffalo Trace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/tag/buffalo-trace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t buy this whiskey!</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/12/12/dont-buy-this-whiskey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/12/12/dont-buy-this-whiskey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the Buffalo Trace Distillery is deep into their Single Oak Project, with quarterly releases of 12 different whiskeys over the next few years, I was wondering if they were still going to continue with their ongoing &#8220;Experimental Collection&#8221; releases. I got the answer to that question last week, when two new review samples showed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/BTEC-Oats2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9697" title="BTEC Oats" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/BTEC-Oats2-224x300.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="300" /></a>Now that the Buffalo Trace Distillery is deep into their <a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/05/16/buffalo-traces-new-single-oak-project-part-1/">Single Oak Project</a>, with quarterly releases of 12 different whiskeys over the next few years, I was wondering if they were still going to continue with their ongoing &#8220;Experimental Collection&#8221; releases. I got the answer to that question last week, when two new review samples showed up.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the good news. I like trying new whiskeys and I really like all the experimenting going on at Buffalo Trace.</p>
<p>Before I continue, let me set the stage here about Buffalo Trace&#8217;s EC whiskeys. They are just that: experiments. There have been a bunch of releases over the past several years. I really liked some, thought others were okay, and disliked some too. But, one of the two new releases (shown here) has to be the worst. To me, the taste of it is borderline unpleasant!</p>
<p>The experiment with the two new releases involve the mash bill. Most bourbons are made with corn, malted barley, and rye. Some distilleries, like Maker&#8217;s Mark, replace the rye with wheat. These two new EC whiskeys replace they rye with rice and oats.</p>
<p>Now to the bad news. The EC release with rice in the mashbill is okay enough&#8211;not great, just okay. It&#8217;s a peculiar whisky, but not overly complex or inspiring.</p>
<p>In all fairness, the nose on the EC release made with oats isn&#8217;t all that bad either. Even on the palate, the whiskey begins pleasantly sweet. But then it turns aggressive and harsh, becoming rapidly unappealing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really sure of the exact cause of the unpleasantness. Both of these whiskeys were aged for 9 years, 5 months, and in the same warehouse, but only the oat experiment comes across so harsh towards the finish. Could it be the oats? The length of aging? A combination of the two? Or perhaps even something else?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really not sure. The one thing I am sure of: I could randomly pick any bourbon priced at $10 or more from any retailers&#8217; shelf and be pretty confident I will like it more than this. And, with a suggested price of $46.35 for a 375 ml, bottle, I wouldn&#8217;t go anywhere near this whiskey.</p>
<p>P.S. I&#8217;ve now tasted this whiskey on three separate occassions and feel the same about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/12/12/dont-buy-this-whiskey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: E. H. Taylor Jr. Single Barrel</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/03/review-e-h-taylor-jr-single-barrel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/03/review-e-h-taylor-jr-single-barrel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E. H. Taylor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E. H. Taylor Jr. Single Barrel, 50%, $60
The second release in the new Taylor line by Buffalo Trace, and the first single barrel offering. Similar in personality to the first release (a small batch offering), but a shade darker in color, flavor, and personality. A bit more intense, too, with more mouthfeel, and not as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/EHT-Single-Barrel-Winter-2011.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9515" title="EHT Single Barrel Winter 2011" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/EHT-Single-Barrel-Winter-2011-180x300.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="300" /></a>E. H. Taylor Jr. Single Barrel, 50%, $60</strong></p>
<p>The second release in the new Taylor line by Buffalo Trace, and the first single barrel offering. Similar in personality to the first release (a small batch offering), but a shade darker in color, flavor, and personality. A bit more intense, too, with more mouthfeel, and not as demure. A fair trade-off. Starts off sweet (rummy, burnt dark fruit, fig cake) then becomes dry, with dried spice, tobacco, toasted oak, and leather. Very exciting and distinctive.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 88</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/03/review-e-h-taylor-jr-single-barrel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Buffalo Trace Antique Collection 2011 Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/01/review-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2011-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/01/review-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2011-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace Antique Collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We still have no power at the Whisky Advocate offices in PA, thanks to the record-breaking snow storm. But, since tonight is WhiskyFest New York, we are in New York where there is power, Internet access, and WHISKEY! So, I am finally able to post a review.
The eagerly awaited annual release from Buffalo Trace distillery [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">We still have no power at the <em>Whisky Advocate</em> offices in PA, thanks to the record-breaking snow storm. But, since tonight is WhiskyFest New York, we are in New York where there is power, Internet access, and WHISKEY! So, I am finally able to post a review.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The eagerly awaited annual release from Buffalo Trace distillery is out. Last year’s release was one of their best. This year is a repeat performance. Well done!<br />
<a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BT-AntCollection-2011-low-res.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9495 alignright" title="BT AntCollection 2011 low res" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BT-AntCollection-2011-low-res-300x221.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="221" /> </a></p>
<p><strong>Sazerac Rye 18 year old, 45%, $70</strong></p>
<p>Very similar to last year’s release. Well rounded, with a gently sweet foundation (toffee, vanilla taffy), pleasant spice (cinnamon, mocha, soft evergreen), date, glazed citrus, bramble, and a gentle finish for a rye. A classic ultra-aged rye whiskey.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 96</p>
<p><strong>William Larue Weller, 66.75%, $70</strong></p>
<p>No age statement, but distilled in 1998. The only wheated recipe bourbon in the bunch, and a very good one at that. Higher in strength than last year’s offering (which was 63.3%), but very similar (and equally as impressive). The most elegant and smoothest of this collection, with layered sweetness (honey, caramel, marzipan, maple syrup), fig, blackberry preserve, hint of green tea, and just the right amount of spice for balance (nutmeg, cinnamon, cocoa).</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 95</p>
<p><strong>George T. Stagg, 71.3%, $70</strong></p>
<p>At this strength, it’s almost like getting two whiskeys for the price of one. A great value, considering its age. (It’s not identified on the label, but was distilled in 1993.) Try to find a great 18 year old, cask-strength single malt scotch for this price. Very mature — with a good dose of oak — but not excessively so. Notes of toffee, tobacco, dark molasses, roasted nuts, dried vanilla, leather, and a hint of dusty corn. Dry on the finish, with lingering leather and tobacco.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 95</p>
<p><strong>Thomas H. Handy Sazerac, 64.3%, $70</strong></p>
<p>The youngster in the family. One taste and its relative youth is confirmed. (But no worries; it’s mature enough to enjoy neat or with some water (and would be a killer in cocktails). This is rye whiskey in its most vibrant, masculine, and purest form. Bold spice (fresh evergreen, warming cinnamon), honey-coated orchard fruit, golden raisin, caramel, and brandy with a crisp, clean finish. The American equivalent to a young, cask-strength, smoky Islay whisky.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 93</p>
<p><strong>Eagle Rare 17 year old, 45%, $70</strong></p>
<p>The most underrated of the five in the collection, but this year’s release (like last year’s) is very lovely bourbon. Perhaps just a bit softer than last year, but with a similar profile: very even keeled and nicely balanced, with sweet notes (vanilla, toffee, <em>añejo</em> rum) peppered with soft orchard fruit and spice (cocoa, cinnamon, nutmeg, hint of mint), polished oak, and subtle tobacco.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 93</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/01/review-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2011-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More new releases, and my general thoughts on them</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/28/more-new-releases-and-my-general-thoughts-on-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/28/more-new-releases-and-my-general-thoughts-on-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hakushu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jameson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pappy Van Winkle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redbreast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suntory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodford Reserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again, this is from a U.S. perspective&#8230;
Starting with Ireland, it looks like Jameson is introducing a new whiskey in their &#8220;Reserve&#8221; line. I received an invitation to attend an event in New York this Sunday where they will be uncorking the first bottle of Jameson Select Reserve Black Barrel. Black must be the new cool [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Again, this is from a U.S. perspective&#8230;</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Redbreast-12-CS-Bottle-amp-SBC-HR.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9556" title="Redbreast 12 Year Old Cask Strength Whiskey. Bottle &amp; Box" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Redbreast-12-CS-Bottle-amp-SBC-HR-254x300.jpg" alt="" width="254" height="300" /></a>Starting with Ireland, it looks like Jameson is introducing a new whiskey in their &#8220;Reserve&#8221; line. I received an invitation to attend an event in New York this Sunday where they will be uncorking the first bottle of <strong>Jameson Select Reserve Black Barrel</strong>. Black must be the new cool these days, because we&#8217;ve recently seen the introduction of Crown Royal Black, Johnnie Walker Double Black, Canadian Mist Black Diamond, Bruichladdich Black Art, and now this whiskey. I guess Black Bush  and Black Bottle were way ahead of their time&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, from Ireland, I got my hands on a review sample of the new <strong>Redbreast 12 year old Cask Strength,</strong> which is supposed to arrive here in the U.S. sometime early next year. Amazing stuff!</p>
<p>You recently saw my review of the new Bruichladdich 10 year old. Well, I also received a review sample of the new <strong>Kilchoman 100% Islay</strong> release. It&#8217;s bottled at 50% ABV (slightly higher than the standard releases), and priced higher too at $100. It&#8217;s called 100% Islay because, according to my press release, it&#8217;s produced from barley grown, malted, distilled matured, and bottled at the distillery. Only 780 bottle are coming to the U.S.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried it and must admit that&#8211;as cool as this bottling is with the &#8220;all Islay&#8221; theme&#8211;it&#8217;s my least favorite of the Kilchoman releases here in the U.S. It just taste too young and immature to me, which is atypical for Kilchoman. Their 3-4 year old whiskies usually tastes a few years older than they really are. My advice: go and get a bottle of the Spring 2011 bottling if you can find one. That&#8217;s my favorite of the releases so far.</p>
<p>Turning to the U.S., <strong>Buffalo Trace</strong> just announced the third release of their <strong>Single Oak project</strong>. I&#8217;ve tasted all the whiskeys from the first two releases. I must say that, as a whole, I liked the second release more than the first release, which had a lot of whiskeys in the 12 bottle lot with an aggressive amount of oak influence. Round two was tamer and more to my liking. (In fact, I actually thought a couple from the second round to be too tame&#8230;!)</p>
<p>The news on the <strong>Woodford Reserve Master&#8217;s Collection</strong> release for 2011 is out. This time it&#8217;s actually two releases: both 100% rye whiskeys. One is aged in new charred oak barrels, while the other is aged in first fill Woodford barrels. Details to follow.</p>
<p>The 2011 allocation of Van Winkle whiskeys are coming out. Again, they will be in very limited supply. The collection consists of <strong>Old Rip Van Winkle</strong> 10 years, available in 90 proof and 107 proof; <strong>Van Winkle Special Reserve</strong> Bourbon, aged 12 years; <strong>Pappy Van Winkle’s Family Reserve</strong> Bourbons, aged 15 years, 20 years and 23 years; and <strong>Van Winkle Family Reserve Rye</strong> Whiskey, aged 13 years.</p>
<p>Feeling a bit overwhelmed and not sure which one to buy? I tasted my way through the 10, 15, 20, and 23 year olds recently at WhiskyFest San Francisco. My favorite was the 15 year old. That&#8217;s the sweet spot in the range. Save yourself some money and get this one instead of the 20 or 23 year old.</p>
<p>Finally, I wanted to mention again that <strong>Suntory&#8217;s Hakushu</strong> whisky is finally being distributed here in the U.S. Unlike Suntory&#8217;s Yamazaki whisky, which has been available for quite some time here, the Hakushu is slightly smoky. (If you like whiskies like Ardmore or Oban, then you might want to give this one a try.)  I really enjoy the entire line of whiskies from Hakushu and have been asking Suntory to bring this whisky to the U.S. ever since I toured the distillery several years ago. For now, we&#8217;re only getting the 12 year old (43%, $60). Hopefully, the 18 year old will follow shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/28/more-new-releases-and-my-general-thoughts-on-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bourbon from Virginia&#8230;and Kentucky (sort of)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/20/a-bourbon-from-virginia-and-kentucky-sort-of/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/20/a-bourbon-from-virginia-and-kentucky-sort-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A. Smith Bowman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewhiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Truman Cox has moved from the Buffalo Trace distillery in Kentucky to replace retiring Master Distiller Joe Dangler at the A. Smith Bowman (ASB) distillery in Virginia, and he&#8217;s wasting no time. This just came in yesterday. (See picture.) It a limited edition bottling under the Abraham Bowman label, barrel proof (69.3%), and over 18 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thewhiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Bowman-bottle.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9447" title="Bowman bottle" src="http://www.thewhiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Bowman-bottle-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a>Truman Cox has moved from the Buffalo Trace distillery in Kentucky to replace retiring Master Distiller Joe Dangler at the A. Smith Bowman (ASB) distillery in Virginia, and he&#8217;s wasting no time. This just came in yesterday. (See picture.) It a limited edition bottling under the Abraham Bowman label, barrel proof (69.3%), and over 18 years old.</p>
<p>The whiskey itself also has ties to Buffalo Trace. It was actually distilled at Buffalo Trace, but then spent most of its life maturing in Virginia at the ASB distillery. This was explained to me in the press release that came with the bottle.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pleased to see this distillery reinventing itself, even if in an unusual way. As Truman puts it: &#8220;ASB is coming at the micro-distilling level from a completely unique position. While other micros are starting from the ground-up and growing, ASB is redirecting from a large producer to a microdistillery.&#8221;</p>
<p>He continues: &#8220;While historically a full-scale producer and rectifier with large distribution, we are refocusing our footprint, home place, and marketing efforts at regional levels and practicing the flexibility and innovation that the microdistilling community is known for. We do not hide the fact that we purchase our starting material and source some whiskey from larger distilleries; other microdistilleries do this as well. We do our own distillation for our core whiskey. ASB has the fortunate luxury to source multiple starting distillates, which we will be blending before our distillation for future batches. This will allow us to compose an entirely new starting material to feed our still to come up with a whiskey distinctive to the distilling world.&#8221;</p>
<p>He goes on to say that this particular bottling came from Buffalo Trace, but continues by saying &#8220;However it has spent the better part of its barreled life aging in ASB&#8217;s distinctive warehouse. Since most whiskey men agree that the barrel and aging is where the predominant flavors come from, I believe we are offering an exception bourbon with a rare look at geographical distinction.&#8221;</p>
<p>Having just tasted the whiskey, I can say that I like the whiskey a lot. There&#8217;s no excessive oak, which I feared there might be for an 18 year old bourbon. It&#8217;s nicely balanced and flavorful.</p>
<p>I do not, however, envy Truman and the rest of the team at ASB when it comes to explaining in the future where their whiskies were distilled (or re-distilled), aged and bottled if they truly plan on being open and transparent about the source of their distillate (which doesn&#8217;t seem to be the case with this bottle&#8211;there&#8217;s no mention of it being distilled in Kentucky).  To begin with, the vast majority of the general public thinks that bourbon is only made in Kentucky. And from what I am gathering here, some of the ASB releases down the road could be distilled in Kentucky, Kentucky <em>and </em>Virginia, or only Virginia before being matured in Virginia. (I&#8217;ll try to get Truman to clarify or confirm this.)</p>
<p>Good luck with that, because it won&#8217;t be easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/20/a-bourbon-from-virginia-and-kentucky-sort-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some new whiskies I&#8217;ve been enjoying</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/13/some-new-whiskies-ive-been-enjoying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/13/some-new-whiskies-ive-been-enjoying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Bottler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisky Advocate Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardbeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruichladdich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compass Box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elijah Craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heaven Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kilkerran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pappy Van Winkle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parker's Heritage Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samaroli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shackleton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewhiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was in San Francisco most of last week hosting WhiskyFest (More on that in a bit). We&#8217;re gearing up for our New York WhiskyFest which is only a couple weeks away. In the interim, we&#8217;ve got to put together the Winter issue of Whisky Advocate. So, if you&#8217;re wondering where I&#8217;ve been lately, now you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in San Francisco most of last week hosting <a href="http://www.thewhiskyadvocate.com/whiskyfest_san_francisco.asp">WhiskyFest </a>(More on that in a bit). We&#8217;re gearing up for our New York WhiskyFest which is only a couple weeks away. In the interim, we&#8217;ve got to put together the Winter issue of <em>Whisky Advocate</em>. So, if you&#8217;re wondering where I&#8217;ve been lately, now you know. This is the busiest time of the year for me. The moment I get some free time, I will post something up here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been tasting a lot of whiskies lately. Formal reviews will follow for most of them. But, in the interim, so you can get a jump on your autumn whisky-buying, I&#8217;ll let you know my informal thoughts now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thewhiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Bruichladdich-10-year-old.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9427" title="Bruichladdich 10 year old" src="http://www.thewhiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Bruichladdich-10-year-old-226x300.jpg" alt="" width="226" height="300" /></a>I was able to taste the new <strong>Bruichladdich 10 year old</strong> at WhiskyFest. (It&#8217;s not in the U.S. yet, but the importer brought me a sample.) As you may know, this is the first 10 year old whisky being sold that was produced by the current owners. It&#8217;s a new dawn for Bruichladdich, and I am happy to say that this whisky is <em>very</em> good. Most of it is from bourbon barrels, but there&#8217;s some sherry casks thrown in too. I just hope they can keep this profile consistant going forward. If they do, it could become the go-to entry level non-smoky Island whisky (competing with Highland Park 12 year old and Bunnahabhain 12 year old  for that honor). To me, it tastes like a 12 year old whisky.</p>
<p>Another whisky that surprised me was the <strong>Kilkerran WIP (Work In Progress) 3rd release</strong>. If memory serves me correctly, it&#8217;s 7 years old and tasted surprisingly fresh and also nicely mature for its age.</p>
<p>Dr. Bill Lumsden, after his Ardbeg seminar, let me sample a <strong>1975 Ardbeg</strong> from a sample bottle (Cask #4714) from a refill sherry cask which I thought was outstanding! My favorite whisky of the night. He said they&#8217;ve been using so much from this cask at whisky shows, they won&#8217;t have much left when it is bottled. But let me put it this way: when it&#8217;s bottled, I am buying a bottle (if it doesn&#8217;t cost me an arm and a leg).</p>
<p>I tried some of the <strong>Samaroli</strong> releases. This independent bottler is new to the U.S. I tasted a <strong>1967 Tomintoul</strong> and a <strong>34 year old Glenlivet</strong> which were delicious. (The Glenlivet was not identified as such&#8211;it had a false name which I didn&#8217;t write down. I&#8217;ll try to dig that one up and let you know what it was called.). I&#8217;m not sure what the prices and availability of these whiskies will be at this time. Details to follow.</p>
<p>I have a bottle of the <strong>Shackleton</strong> whisky, which I have really been enjoying over the past couple of weeks. Very distinctive for a blend, and with plenty of character. Dominic Roskrow rated it in the lown 90s for us, and I would probably have given it at least a 90 myself if I formally reviewed it.</p>
<p>Another new blended scotch I really like for its drinkability and versatility is <strong>Compass Box&#8217;s Great King Street</strong>. It&#8217;s not going to set your world on fire, but it was never intended to do so. That&#8217;s what whiskies like Peat Monster are for. Whiskymaker John Glaser continues to impress me.</p>
<p>For the bourbon enthusiasts out there, I&#8217;ve been through the new <strong>Buffalo Trace Antique Collection</strong> a few times already. It&#8217;s just hitting the shelves now. The entire line is stellar&#8211;as it was last year, and they taste very similar to last year&#8217;s release. So, if you liked last year&#8217;s offering, you can be confident that you will like this year&#8217;s releases if you have a chance to buy them. (They are always hard to come by.)</p>
<p>Heaven Hill has two really nice whiskeys that just came out. This year&#8217;s <strong>Parker&#8217;s Heritage Collection</strong> is a 10 year old, 100 proof bourbon finished in Cognac barrels (similar to the old Beam Distillers&#8217; Masterpiece bottling). The cognac doesn&#8217;t dominate, adds intrigue, and this whisky is dangerously drinkable for 100 proof. But, if you are a purist (dare I say stubborn?), and don&#8217;t want people meddling with your bourbon, you might think differently about this offering.</p>
<p>The second whiskey from Heaven Hill is a <strong>Elijah Craig 20 year old single cask</strong> bottling (Cask #3735). The good news: I love this whiskey, and will be rating it in the mid 90s. The bad news: it&#8217;s only available at Heaven Hill&#8217;s Bourbon Heritage Center in Bardstown, KY, and it will set you back $150.</p>
<p>Finally, for those of you who are budget-minded, I tasted my way through the <strong>Pappy Van Winkle</strong> line of bourbons (12, 15, 20 and 23 year old). My favorite? The 15 year old. Save your money and get this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/13/some-new-whiskies-ive-been-enjoying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More whiskies (and whiskeys) heading our way</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/08/31/more-whiskies-and-whiskeys-heading-our-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/08/31/more-whiskies-and-whiskeys-heading-our-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liqueurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drambuie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Four Roses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jefferson's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laphroaig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masterson's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WhistlePig]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=9244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new and seasonal releases are still picking up with autumn just around the bend. (This post is from a U.S. perspective.)
There&#8217;s yet another 10 year old, 100% rye whiskey from an undisclosed Canadian source coming out called Masterson&#8217;s. I have a bottle and tried it last night. It definitely displays the same flavor profile [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Drambuie15.bmp"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9249" title="Drambuie15" src="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Drambuie15.bmp" alt="" /></a>The new and seasonal releases are still picking up with autumn just around the bend. (This post is from a U.S. perspective.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s yet another 10 year old, 100% rye whiskey from an undisclosed Canadian source coming out called Masterson&#8217;s. I have a bottle and tried it last night. It definitely displays the same flavor profile as WhistlePig and Jefferson&#8217;s Rye whiskeys. So, if you missed out on your chance to get those, you have another opportunity with Masterson&#8217;s. It&#8217;s 90 proof and will be priced at around $80.</p>
<p>I also have a review sample of the 2011 Limited Edition release from the Four Roses distillery. This one combines four different recipes, aged between 11 and 13 years. It&#8217;s being released in September.</p>
<p>Buffalo Trace announced the impending release of this year&#8217;s Antique Collection. No change in the whiskey line. Just tweaks. I&#8217;m looking forward to trying them.</p>
<p>Laphroaig Triple Wood is finally hitting the U.S. shores. Look out for that one.</p>
<p>Finally, Drambuie introduced &#8220;Drambuie 15&#8243; in the U.S. It&#8217;s a more premium version of the liqueur, supposedly made with Speyside malts (pictured). It&#8217;s bottled at 43% and will be around $56.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to get some formal reviews done on the American whiskeys and post them up here soon. (You can find my Laphroaig Triple Wood review <a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/2010/09/24/review-laphroaig-triple-wood/">here</a>. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/08/31/more-whiskies-and-whiskeys-heading-our-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some new whiskies here in the U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/08/24/some-new-whiskies-here-in-the-u-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/08/24/some-new-whiskies-here-in-the-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forty Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isle of Skye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suntory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=9239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few thoughts on new whisky information that crossed my desk recently:
The gently peated Hakushu whisky from Suntory is finally coming to the U.S. The official launch is October 12th. I&#8217;ve been pleading with my friends at Suntory to bring it in as a companion to Yamazaki for many years. It&#8217;s great to see it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few thoughts on new whisky information that crossed my desk recently:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/EHT-Single-Barrel-Low-Res.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9241" title="EHT Single Barrel Low Res" src="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/EHT-Single-Barrel-Low-Res-180x300.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="300" /></a>The gently peated Hakushu whisky from Suntory is finally coming to the U.S. The official launch is October 12th. I&#8217;ve been pleading with my friends at Suntory to bring it in as a companion to Yamazaki for many years. It&#8217;s great to see it finally coming here.</p>
<p>Isle of Skye 12 year old blended scotch is finally making its way to our shores. Previously, the U.S. has only been getting the 8 year old.</p>
<p>John Hall, whiskymaker of Canada&#8217;s Forty Creek whisky, has a new &#8220;John&#8217;s Private Cask No. 1&#8243; release. This is coming to the States too. I&#8217;ve tasted this already and it&#8217;s another delicious release by John.</p>
<p>Finally, Buffalo Trace is about to release a new Single Barrel version of their Colonel E. H. Taylor, Jr. bourbon (pictured). This one will be 11 years, 7 months old and bottle in bond (100 proof).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there will be many more new whiskies coming on the market as we approach the holiday season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/08/24/some-new-whiskies-here-in-the-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Releases from Wild Turkey, Compass Box, and Buffalo Trace Distillery</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/06/09/new-releases-from-wild-turkey-compass-box-and-buffalo-trace-distilleries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/06/09/new-releases-from-wild-turkey-compass-box-and-buffalo-trace-distilleries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compass Box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wild Turkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=8742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typically, this isn’t the time of year that we hear of many new product releases. This week however, there was news of three whiskies that have been or are soon to be released.   
Wild Turkey mixes things up with Wild Turkey 81. This is a blend of six, seven and eight year old whiskies bottled in the first package change [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically, this isn’t the time of year that we hear of many new product releases. This week however, there was news of three whiskies that have been or are soon to be released.   </p>
<p>W<a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Wild-Turkey_81_750ml.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8745" title="Wild Turkey_81_750ml" src="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Wild-Turkey_81_750ml-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>ild Turkey mixes things up with Wild Turkey 81. This is a blend of six, seven and eight year old whiskies bottled in the first package change to a Wild Turkey product in almost 15 years. To quote Jimmy Russell, “Even a good old boy changes his shirt every now and again”. He is referring to the “badass” label that dresses the classic Wild Turkey bottle.  But Jimmy was hands off on this creation. Wild Turkey 81 was solely crafted by his son, Eddie. It’s described as a “mixable spirit”, able to face any mixer or cocktail with the characteristic boldness of Wild Turkey. Available in the U.S. with an MSRP of $19.99.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Compass-Box-Artists-Blend-Botttle.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-8744" title="Compass Box Artist's Blend Botttle" src="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Compass-Box-Artists-Blend-Botttle-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Great King Street is the address of Compass Box’s office in Scotland. It’s also the name of their latest release &#8211; a range devoted to blended Scotch whisky. These blends are non-chill-filtered and bottled at natural color. John Glaser, Compass Box Whiskymaker proclaims this range a “rebirth of the blend”, created to appeal to both the malt whisky enthusiasts and those new to whisky. The first release in the Great King Street range is the Artist’s Blend. Bottled at 43%, the Artist’s Blend is available now in Europe and will wash upon the shores of the U.S. and other markets in September. Estimated MSRP is $41.00 per 50cl bottle. (Note: The U.S. will be getting 37.5 and 75cl bottle sizes instead.) More details <a href="http://compassboxwhisky.com/greatkingstreet/">here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Buffalo-Trace-Millennium-Barrel-Bottle-.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8743" title="Buffalo Trace Millennium Barrel Bottle" src="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Buffalo-Trace-Millennium-Barrel-Bottle--150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Buffalo Trace Distillery has released its Millennium Barrel bourbon. Crafted from the last barrel of the 20<sup>th</sup> century that was rolled into the only bonded single barrel warehouse in the world on December 31, 1999. Nearly 12 years later, 174 bottles have been filled, each label handwritten and each bottle individually numbered. The packaging includes a numbered hardwood box containing a piece of the barrel&#8217;s stave. Not one will be available in stores. Buffalo Trace will give each bottle to non-profit organizations across the country to auction off, with the hope to raise $200,000 for charity. Get all of the details and application at <a onclick="javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackEvent','outbound-comment','buffalotacemillennium.com']);" rel="nofollow" href="http://buffalotacemillennium.com/">http://buffalotacemillennium.com/</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/06/09/new-releases-from-wild-turkey-compass-box-and-buffalo-trace-distilleries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buffalo Trace&#8217;s new &#8220;Single Oak&#8221; project: Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/05/16/buffalo-traces-new-single-oak-project-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/05/16/buffalo-traces-new-single-oak-project-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=8612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace newest (and biggest) project was announced a couple weeks back. For those of you who haven&#8217;t heard about it yet (which is understandable given that the whiskeys are only now getting into circulation), here&#8217;s an excerpt from the press release:
Beginning in 1999, then Warehouse Manager Ronnie Eddins traveled to the Missouri Ozarks to hand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Buffalo-Trace-Single-Oak-Project-1st-Release-Low-Res-2.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Buffalo-Trace-Single-Oak-Project-1st-Release-Low-Res-21.jpg"></a>Buffalo Trace newest (and biggest) project was announced a couple weeks back. For those of you who haven&#8217;t heard about it yet (which is understandable given that the whiskeys are only now getting into circulation), here&#8217;s an excerpt from the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Beginning in 1999, then Warehouse Manager Ronnie Eddins traveled to the Missouri Ozarks to hand pick 96 trees, consisting of fine grain, medium grain and coarse grain wood, based on the tree’s growth rings. Each type of grain indicates a different growth rate and will yield a different flavor profile.  From there, each tree was cut into a top and a bottom piece, yielding 192 unique sections. Next stop was the lumber yard, where staves were created from each section and were tagged and tracked. The staves were divided into two groups and given different air dried seasonings, 6 months and 12 months.  The air drying allows Mother Nature to break down some of the more harsh flavored characteristics commonly found in wood.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Buffalo-Trace-Single-Oak-Project-1st-Release-Low-Res-22.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-8622" style="margin: 2px 4px;" title="Buffalo Trace Single Oak Project 1st Release Low Res (2)" src="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Buffalo-Trace-Single-Oak-Project-1st-Release-Low-Res-22-300x122.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="122" /></a>After all the staves were air dried, a single barrel was then created from each tree section, resulting in 192 total barrels.</p>
<p>The next step in the process was to experiment with different char levels of the barrels. Two different char levels were used, a number three and a number four char. (The standard char level for all Buffalo Trace products is a number four char, which is a 55 second burn.</p>
<p>Then, barrels were filled with one of two different recipes, a wheat and a rye recipe bourbon. To further the variety of experiments, barrels were filled at two different proofs, 105 proof and 125 proof.  And if this wasn’t enough, two completely different warehouses were used, one with a wooden ricks and one with concrete floors.  In total, seven different variables were employed in Buffalo Trace’s ultimate experiment.</p>
<p>And then, the waiting began.  For eight years the Distillery continued with its tracking process, creating intricate databases and coming up with a potential of 1,396 tasting combinations from these 192 barrels!</p></blockquote>
<p>The Single Oak project is <em>part</em> of a much larger, and noble, effort: to create the perfect bourbon. How? By asking consumers to rate the whiskey they taste and then provide this feedback to Buffalo Trace via <a href="http://www.singleoakproject.com/">this new website </a>that has been established for the Single Oak project.  As the press release puts it:</p>
<blockquote><p>On the website, consumers create a profile and after rating each bottle, will then see the aging details and provenance of each barrel. They can interact with others who have also reviewed the barrel, compare their reviews on the same barrel, and even use it as a learning process for themselves by discovering which characteristics they like in a bourbon to help them select future favorites.  </p>
<p>Participants online will earn points after reach review and most importantly, help Buffalo Trace Distillery create the perfect bourbon!</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Mark, at the conclusion of the project, they plan to take the top rated barrel, make more of that product and launch it under the Single Oak Project nameplate. So, ultimately, the 192 unique barrels with 1,396 tasting combinations will lead to one style of bourbon. One damned good bourbon!</p>
<p>I say this is only <em>part </em>of a much larger effort to create the perfect bourbon because over the years, Mark Brown, President and CEO of Buffalo Trace, has told me of some of his other projects to achieve this goal. One of them is to critically deconstruct the tasting notes and ratings of key whiskey writers (including yours truly). Incidentally, he told me just last week that, even though each of us may differ the way we describe our whiskeys, there is common ground in our reviews too. (He didn&#8217;t go into detail, so I suppose we&#8217;ll save that for a later time.)</p>
<p>Will the lucky ones who actually happen to get their hands on a bottle of Single Oak Project whiskey take the time to rate it and record it on the Single Oak Project website? Only time will tell, but I hope so.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another snippet from the press release, describing the logistics of the first release (and future releases):</p>
<blockquote><p>The first release of the Single Oak Project Bourbon is expected to hit stores nationwide in very limited quantities around the end of May. Each release will consist of 12 unique single barrel bourbons.</p>
<p>Every case will contain 12 bottles, each from a different barrel. The first release is made up of barrel numbers 3, 4, 35, 36, 67, 68, 99, 100, 131, 132, 163 and 164. Each of these barrels had the same entry proof, seasoning, char level and warehouse aging location. However, the  hope is to identify the differences in taste based on recipe, wood grain size and tree cut as these characteristics varied amongst this group of barrels.</p>
<p>There will be a series of releases over the next four years until all of the 192 barrels have been released.  All releases will be packaged in a 375ml bottle. Suggested retail pricing is $46.35. </p></blockquote>
<p>In Part 2 of my post on this project (which will probably be later in the week), I will get out my secret decoder ring and tell you about the first 12 releases and how each barrel of bourbon differs. Additionally, I&#8217;ve tasted all of them and, while I don&#8217;t plan on rating them formally, I will give you my general thoughts on them (including which ones I liked, the ones I would take a pass on, and why).</p>
<p>Stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/05/16/buffalo-traces-new-single-oak-project-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Buffalo Trace Antique Collection (2010 Release)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/01/06/review-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2010-release/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/01/06/review-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2010-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=7363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this might be the best annual release of these five whiskeys so far. All are classics, or very close to it.
96 William Larue Weller, 63.3%, $70
Very similar to last year’s release. (A good thing, since it was wonderful!) Very smooth, with layered sweetness (toffee, fig cake, nougat, maple syrup), dark fruit (black raspberry, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this might be the best annual release of these five whiskeys so far. All are classics, or very close to it.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Antique-Collection-family-shot-2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-7365" title="Antique Collection family shot (2)" src="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Antique-Collection-family-shot-2-300x216.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a>96 William Larue Weller, 63.3%, $70</strong></p>
<p>Very similar to last year’s release. (A good thing, since it was wonderful!) Very smooth, with layered sweetness (toffee, fig cake, nougat, maple syrup), dark fruit (black raspberry, blueberry), cinnamon, and polished oak on the finish. A whisky of elegance and sophistication.</p>
<p><strong>95 Sazerac Rye, 18 year old, 45%, $70</strong></p>
<p>This was my second lowest rated whiskey from the 2009 Collection (a 91 rating). This one is an impressive whiskey, and an improvement from last year. It’s soft (for a straight rye), well rounded, and easy to embrace, with tamed spice (cinnamon, mint, vanilla, mocha), nougat, toffee, fruit (bramble, subtle citrus), subtle date, and polished leather on the finish. Buffalo Trace is playing a shell game with this aged rye (being stored in stainless steel tanks over the past several years until new stocks mature), but in this instance there seems to be a prize under every shell. Well done!</p>
<p><strong>94 George T. Stagg, 71.5%, $70</strong></p>
<p>Very close to last year’s release in personality, with great balance between the sweetness, spice, and fruit. Nicely structured, with clearly defined notes of toffee, molasses, cinnamon, vanilla bean, dried citrus, brittle mint, roasted nuts, tobacco, and polished leather on the finish. A great value too, considering it’s almost the equivalent of two bottles of bourbon.</p>
<p><strong>93 Thomas H. Handy Rye, 63.45%, $70</strong></p>
<p>One of the best Handy offerings yet. Very vibrant with dynamic spice (firm mint, warming cinnamon, allspice, hint of clove) and lush fruit (citrus, orchard fruit, golden raisin, brandy, and teasing coconut), all tamed by a bed of soothing caramel and honey. It’s not easy for a whisky to come across as excitingly youthful, yet nicely matured. It’s a difficult balance to achieve, and this whiskey finds that balance.</p>
<p><strong>93 Eagle Rare, 17 year old, 45%, $70</strong></p>
<p>The only setback from last year’s Antique Collection release, when I rated it an 84 because it was showing too much wood (especially compared to the 2007-2008 releases). The 2010 release is back on track, with great balance, and showing very traditional notes of vanilla toffee, rummy molasses, dusty corn, soft summer fruit, and a sprinkling of spice (cinnamon, mint, cocoa), with oak resin to balance out the sweet notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/01/06/review-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2010-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 rated whiskies in the new issue of Malt Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/11/29/top-10-rated-whiskies-in-the-new-issue-of-malt-advocate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/11/29/top-10-rated-whiskies-in-the-new-issue-of-malt-advocate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malt Advocate Mag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribou Crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compass Box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duncan Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forty Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highland Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knob Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parker's Heritage Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redbreast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=7078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a sneak peek  of the top 10 rated whiskies in the upcoming issue of Malt Advocate magazine (the Winter 2010 issue). Most have been reviewed here already, but I thought it would be helpful if you had them all organized in one post.
96 Redbreast, 12 year old, 40%, $43
Very elegant, complex, and stylish. Honeyed and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a sneak peek  of the top 10 rated whiskies in the upcoming issue of <em>Malt Advocate</em> magazine (the Winter 2010 issue). Most have been reviewed here already, but I thought it would be helpful if you had them all organized in one post.</p>
<p><strong>96 Redbreast, 12 year old, 40%, $43</strong><br />
Very elegant, complex, and stylish. Honeyed and silky in texture, with toffee, toasted marshmallow, nougat, maple syrup, banana bread, and a hint of toasted coconut. Bright fruit and golden raisin blend in nicely with the layers of sweetness. Impeccable balance and very approachable. Classic Irish whiskey!</p>
<p><strong>95 Compass Box Flaming Heart (10th Anniversary bottling), 48.9%, $105</strong><br />
A marriage of three different single malts, aged in American and French oak. This whisky shows the advantage of marrying whiskies from more than one distillery (when properly done). Vibrant, with a complex array of fruit (orchard fruit, sultana), sweetness (light toffee, marzipan, honeyed malt), spice (creamy vanilla, mocha, warming pepper), smoke (tar, smoked olive, coal), and lesser notes of toasted almond and beach pebbles. More smoke and tar on the palate than the nose, yet always in balance. Well played!</p>
<p><strong>95 Buffalo Trace Experimental Collection, 1995 Vintage, “American Oak Chips Seasoned,” 45%, $47/375ml</strong><br />
Surprisingly light and fresh for a 15 year old whiskey. Crisply spiced, with cinnamon, evergreen, vanilla, anise, and teaberry. Hints of dried fruit, kissed with light honey and a wisp of smoke. Balanced and clean throughout, and very drinkable. An excellent whiskey!</p>
<p><strong>95 Forty Creek Confederation Oak Reserve, 40%, $70</strong><br />
Perhaps the finest Canadian whisky I have ever tasted. Creamy and seamless from beginning to end. Gently sweet, with orange creamsicle, marzipan, sultana, praline, maple syrup, and a hint of coconut macaroon. Forty Creek whiskies have always been very good, but none have ever had the right stuff to reach classic status. Until now, that is. An outstanding, very distinctive whisky!</p>
<p><strong>94 Highland Park, 1970 vintage, 48%, £2,250</strong><br />
This limited edition bottling consists of a marriage of both European and American oak. Still lively for its age, and beautifully balanced. Bountiful golden fruit (sultana, pineapple upside down cake, tangerine, overripe nectarine) balanced by soothing, creamy vanilla. A peppering of dried spice, chamomile tea, toasted oak, cigar box, and subtle smoke round out the palate. Soft and seductive. (Not available in the U.S.)</p>
<p><strong>94 Knob Creek Single Barrel, 9 year old, 60%, $40</strong><br />
This new single barrel expression of Knob Creek tastes very similar to the original “small batch” Knob Creek (when brought down to the same alcohol level). If anything, it’s slightly drier, more elegant, not as heavy on the palate, and more sophisticated — but I am reaching here. The similarity is a good thing, because I really enjoy the original expression. Keeping in mind that no two barrels are exactly alike, your decision to purchase the single barrel might just come down to whether you want to pay a little more for a higher strength version, and whether knowing that it might taste a little different than the standard small batch bottling excites you. This is a stylish, big, broad-shouldered bourbon with a thick, sweet foundation (nutty toffee, pot still rum, maple syrup) peppered with spice (cinnamon, but also vanilla and evergreen) and dried fruit. Dry, warming, resinous finish. (Incidentally, I would rate the small batch within a point or two, and the tasting notes would be very similar.)</p>
<p><strong>93 Parker’s Heritage Collection (2010 release), 10 year old, 63.9%, $80</strong><br />
Soft, sweet, and very smooth. Richly textured layers of caramel, toffee, vanilla fudge, nougat, maple syrup, and <em>rhum agricole</em>. Blackberry, date nut bread, cinnamon, subtle cocoa, and nutmeg add complexity. Clean, polished, and perilously drinkable. A delicious wheated bourbon! (Not quite the complexity of the 2009 William Larue Weller (a benchmark wheated bourbon which I rated a 96), but getting close.</p>
<p><strong>93 High West Straight Rye Whiskey, 12 year old, 46%, $50/375ml</strong><br />
A bottling from only five barrels of 95% rye whiskey produced at the former Seagram’s distillery in Indiana. It’s the American whiskey equivalent of drinking Ardbeg Supernova. Powerful and invigorating are words that come to mind. Crisp mint, warming cinnamon, dried citrus, cocoa, roasted nuts, and subtle botanicals are soothed by caramel, molasses, and honeyed orchard fruit. Brisk, bracing, spicy finish. The notes are clean, and the whiskey’s not just a one-trick “rye” pony. The sweetness balances the rye spice quite nicely. If you just can’t get enough rye in your whiskey, then this one’s for you. (Available only at the High West Distillery in Park City, Utah.)</p>
<p><strong>93 Caribou Crossing, Single Barrel, 40%, $50</strong><br />
Those of you who think Canadian whiskies are thin and bland should give this one a try. No, it’s not a new concept, like Forty Creek. It’s still very much a “traditional” Canadian. But when compared to most Canadian whiskies, it’s richer, creamier, and velvety smooth. The flavors are straightforward — primarily vanilla, with some crème brûlée, toasted marshmallow, tangerine, peaches and cream, and gentle rye spice — but they are clean and well-balanced. A delicious, lighter-style whisky.</p>
<p><strong>92 Duncan Taylor “NC2” (distilled at Aberlour), 16 year old, 46%, $80</strong><br />
This whisky packs a lot of clean, complex, and well-balanced flavors. It features a creamy, layered, malty-sweet foundation (vanilla, caramel, toffee) chock full of bright fruit (golden raisin, honeyed orchard fruit, currant), rounded out by firm, dried spice (cinnamon, nutmeg, mint) that dances on the palate. Long, warming, spicy finish. Nicely done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/11/29/top-10-rated-whiskies-in-the-new-issue-of-malt-advocate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your predictions for 2010?</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/14/your-predictions-for-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/14/your-predictions-for-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High West Distillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Party Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodford Reserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay everyone, get out your crystal ball. What do you see happening to the whisky (and whiskey) industry in 2010? I&#8217;ll start the discussion by making a couple of predictions myself.
 
More experimental American whiskeys
The American whiskey industry was very slow getting on the experimenting bandwagon (relative to Scotch, Japanese, and Irish whiskey). But with the likes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay everyone, get out your crystal ball. What do you see happening to the whisky (and whiskey) industry in 2010? I&#8217;ll start the discussion by making a couple of predictions myself.</p>
<p> <br />
<strong>More experimental American whiskeys</strong><br />
The American whiskey industry was very slow getting on the experimenting bandwagon (relative to Scotch, Japanese, and Irish whiskey). But with the likes of Woodford Reserve&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2009/11/06/review-woodford-reserve-masters-collection-seasoned-oak-finish/">Master&#8217;s Collection </a>whiskeys, <a href="http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2009/10/22/review-high-west-bourye-batch-1/">High West&#8217;s &#8220;Bourye</a>&#8220;, The Party Sources &#8220;<a href="http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2009/12/08/bourbon-and-rye-whiskey-drinkers-pay-attention-something-new/">Wheat on Rye&#8221; Experimental Whiskey</a> (in association with Buffalo Trace Distillery), and the blossoming small, artisanal distilleries, I think (or at least I hope) 2010 will see more different kinds of experimental bourbons and other American whiskeys on the market than ever before.</p>
<p><strong>More Scotch whiskies without age statements</strong><br />
Across the pond in Scotland, I think more and more distilleries will continue abandoning age statements. It gives them more flexibility in what goes in the bottle. It will also help them blend in younger whiskey coming on the market with existing stocks of older whisky and still command a fair price for it.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s your turn. Tell us what you think will happen in 2010. We can come back to this one year from now and see how well we did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/14/your-predictions-for-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Buffalo Trace Experimental Collection &#8220;Twice Barreled&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/11/06/review-buffalo-trace-experimental-collection-twice-barreled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/11/06/review-buffalo-trace-experimental-collection-twice-barreled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both of these whiskeys were re-barreled into new charred oak barrels. The difference is that one is just older than the other (11-plus years versus 16-plus years). Full details on each bottling are here. I love these experiments! They push the extremes, open our eyes, and create excitement.
 
 
 
Buffalo Trace Experimental Collection “Double Barreled,” 1997 Vintage, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2630" style="margin: 2px 5px;" title="136" src="http://blog.maltadvocate.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/1362-300x225.jpg" alt="136" width="300" height="225" />Both of these whiskeys were re-barreled into new charred oak barrels. The difference is that one is just older than the other (11-plus years versus 16-plus years). Full details on each bottling are <a href="http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2009/10/09/new-buffalo-trace-experimenatal-whiskeys-double-barreled/">here</a>. I love these experiments! They push the extremes, open our eyes, and create excitement.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Buffalo Trace Experimental Collection “Double Barreled,” 1997 Vintage, 45%, $47</strong></p>
<p>Nice effort overall. My gut feeling is that this whiskey <em>might</em> have been better a couple years ago, but I wouldn’t call the second barrel impact excessive. It’s rich and smooth, with sweeter notes of caramel, rich vanilla and subtle candied fruit, underpinned by firm spice (especially cinnamon) which kicks in on the finish. It comes across as very traditional bourbon with perhaps a little extra oak impact on the back end.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Malt Advocate</em> magazine rating: 88</p>
<p><strong>Buffalo Trace Experimental Collection “Double Barreled,” 1993 Vintage, 45%, $47<br />
</strong></p>
<p>A big bourbon in many respects, but this is one whiskey where I would have happily settled for a “Single Barreled.” To be honest, there are some good qualities to this whiskey. The nose is wonderful! (I tasted this whiskey straight from the barrel right before it was bottled and it was more aggressive. I think the lower strength and chill-filtering has helped to tame this beast.) Even the palate starts out fine, with chewy toffee, molasses, dark fruit, raisin and dates. But it is quickly consumed by intensely dry oak spice, gripping resin, and leather which clings to my tongue and won’t let go. In this instance, <em>last</em> impressions are lasting impressions.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Malt Advocate</em> magazine rating: 71</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/11/06/review-buffalo-trace-experimental-collection-twice-barreled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six incredibly rare whiskies (one bottle produced of each) for WhiskyFest San Francisco</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/09/19/six-incredibly-rare-whiskies-one-bottle-produced-of-each-for-whiskyfest-san-francisco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/09/19/six-incredibly-rare-whiskies-one-bottle-produced-of-each-for-whiskyfest-san-francisco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WhiskyFest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balvenie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruichladdich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenfiddich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isle of Jura]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=1995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six different whiskymakers from six different distilleries have agreed to make a unique bottle of whisky (bottle #1 of 1) just for WhiskyFest San Francisco, which takes place on October 16th. Attendees will be able to taste a 1/2 ounce pour for a requested $20 donation to charity (Meals on Wheels).
Here are the six whiskies, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six different whiskymakers from six different distilleries have agreed to make a unique bottle of whisky (bottle #1 of 1) just for <a href="http://www.maltadvocate.com/docs/whiskyfest/san_francisco/default.aspx">WhiskyFest San Francisco</a>, which takes place on October 16th. Attendees will be able to taste a 1/2 ounce pour for a requested $20 donation to charity (Meals on Wheels).</p>
<p>Here are the six whiskies, along with a description of each, as provided by the whiskymaker.</p>
<p><strong>Isle of Jura</strong>- Willie Tait: &#8220;I put a hogs head of Jura down on the 23rd Nov 1989, on my daughter&#8217;s 13th birthday. This was my legacy for my children, as they have already taken all my money.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Bruichladdich</strong>- Jim McEwan: &#8220;The title of my whisky will be &#8220;Working on a Dream&#8221; it will be a vatting of 46 years of Bruichladdich as that is the time I have been in the business. A single malt made by humble men on the west coast of Islay whereby you can feel and taste their personality, honesty and passion in every sip you take.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>The Dalmore</strong>- Richard Paterson: As Neil Armstrong stepped onto the lunar surface for the very first time at 02.56 GMT on 21st July 1969, the new spirit of Dalmore down on Earth on this very same day was being transported onto the circular surface of American White Oak to begin its epic journey too.</p>
<p><strong>The Balvenie</strong>- David Stewart: David now has an intimate knowledge of where his personal favorites are within the Balvenie warehouses, many of which he has been carefully nurturing for several years. David&#8217;s unique bottling will be a single cask sampling drawn directly from one of this highly personal selections.</p>
<p><strong>Glenfiddich</strong>- Brian Kinsman: Cask samples are retained long after the cask has long been bottled and savored. They form a historical archive of Glenfiddich&#8217;s greatest and best. Brian will be selecting from these precious remnants to craft a unique and unrepeatable one-bottle &#8220;vatting&#8221; of Glenfiddich.</p>
<p><strong>Buffalo Trace-</strong> Our charity Buffalo Trace bottle contains the very first sample ever drawn from our &#8220;Millennium Barrel.&#8221; This barrel was filled on December 31, 1999, that&#8217;s why we call it our &#8220;Millennium Barrel.&#8221; It was the very last barrel that we filled on the last day of the last century.</p>
<p>This is about as rare as whisky gets. And you can be sure they are going to taste great. Come to WhiskyFest San Francisco, try one of these rare treats, and help support a good cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/09/19/six-incredibly-rare-whiskies-one-bottle-produced-of-each-for-whiskyfest-san-francisco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

