<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Whisky Advocate Blog &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t buy this whiskey!</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/12/12/dont-buy-this-whiskey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/12/12/dont-buy-this-whiskey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the Buffalo Trace Distillery is deep into their Single Oak Project, with quarterly releases of 12 different whiskeys over the next few years, I was wondering if they were still going to continue with their ongoing &#8220;Experimental Collection&#8221; releases. I got the answer to that question last week, when two new review samples showed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/BTEC-Oats2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9697" title="BTEC Oats" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/BTEC-Oats2-224x300.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="300" /></a>Now that the Buffalo Trace Distillery is deep into their <a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/05/16/buffalo-traces-new-single-oak-project-part-1/">Single Oak Project</a>, with quarterly releases of 12 different whiskeys over the next few years, I was wondering if they were still going to continue with their ongoing &#8220;Experimental Collection&#8221; releases. I got the answer to that question last week, when two new review samples showed up.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the good news. I like trying new whiskeys and I really like all the experimenting going on at Buffalo Trace.</p>
<p>Before I continue, let me set the stage here about Buffalo Trace&#8217;s EC whiskeys. They are just that: experiments. There have been a bunch of releases over the past several years. I really liked some, thought others were okay, and disliked some too. But, one of the two new releases (shown here) has to be the worst. To me, the taste of it is borderline unpleasant!</p>
<p>The experiment with the two new releases involve the mash bill. Most bourbons are made with corn, malted barley, and rye. Some distilleries, like Maker&#8217;s Mark, replace the rye with wheat. These two new EC whiskeys replace they rye with rice and oats.</p>
<p>Now to the bad news. The EC release with rice in the mashbill is okay enough&#8211;not great, just okay. It&#8217;s a peculiar whisky, but not overly complex or inspiring.</p>
<p>In all fairness, the nose on the EC release made with oats isn&#8217;t all that bad either. Even on the palate, the whiskey begins pleasantly sweet. But then it turns aggressive and harsh, becoming rapidly unappealing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really sure of the exact cause of the unpleasantness. Both of these whiskeys were aged for 9 years, 5 months, and in the same warehouse, but only the oat experiment comes across so harsh towards the finish. Could it be the oats? The length of aging? A combination of the two? Or perhaps even something else?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really not sure. The one thing I am sure of: I could randomly pick any bourbon priced at $10 or more from any retailers&#8217; shelf and be pretty confident I will like it more than this. And, with a suggested price of $46.35 for a 375 ml, bottle, I wouldn&#8217;t go anywhere near this whiskey.</p>
<p>P.S. I&#8217;ve now tasted this whiskey on three separate occassions and feel the same about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/12/12/dont-buy-this-whiskey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top ten rated whiskies in the Winter 2011 issue of Whisky Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/29/top-ten-rated-whiskies-from-the-winter-2011-issue-of-whisky-advocate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/29/top-ten-rated-whiskies-from-the-winter-2011-issue-of-whisky-advocate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisky Advocate Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aberfeldy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adelphi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Rare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elijah Craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George T. Stagg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redbreast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sazerac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas H. Handy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Larue Weller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new issue of Whisky Advocate  mails this week. Here&#8217;s a sneak preview of the top ten rated whiskies from the Buying Guide. (All prices listed in dollars are, or will soon be, available in the U.S.) The number of American whiskeys on this list is a testiment to the overall quality of American [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new issue of <em>Whisky Advocate </em> mails this week. Here&#8217;s a sneak preview of the top ten rated whiskies from the Buying Guide. (All prices listed in dollars are, or will soon be, available in the U.S.) The number of American whiskeys on this list is a testiment to the overall quality of American whiskeys on the market right now (and the impressiveness of Buffalo Trace&#8217;s Antique Collection).</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Elijah-Craig-20-YO-barrel-3735.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9606" title="Elijah Craig 20 YO barrel #3735" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Elijah-Craig-20-YO-barrel-3735-e1322499752983-224x300.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="188" /></a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Elijah Craig Barrel No. 3,735 20 year old, 45%, $150</strong></p>
<p>From one barrel, and only sold in one location, but well worth the effort to procure a bottle. Nutty toffee, pecan pie, apricot, berried jam, and nougat, peppered with cinnamon, mint, cocoa, and tobacco. Warming, with polished leather and dried spice on the finish.  Seamless, richly textured, and impeccably balanced. (Exclusive to the Bourbon Heritage Center at the Heaven Hill distillery in Bardstown, KY.) <em>—John Hansell</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 96<strong></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Redbreast 12 Year Old Cask Strength, 57.7%, €75<a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Redbreast-12-CS-Bottle-amp-SBC-low-res1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-9609" title="Redbreast 12 Year Old Cask Strength Whiskey. Bottle &amp; Box" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Redbreast-12-CS-Bottle-amp-SBC-low-res1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></strong></p>
<p>Irish Distillers has already released two 90+ pot still whiskeys this year, but this is the knockout blow, an immense take on the wonderful Redbreast. The nose gives little away, all damp autumn leaves and fermenting forest fruit, but on the palate it&#8217;s a fireworks display, a colorful mix of apple and pear, berries, vine fruits, chocolate liqueur, and oily pureed fruit. It&#8217;s coming to the States soon, and rumor has it there&#8217;s more to follow. But this will do. I can&#8217;t think if I&#8217;ve ever tasted a better Irish whiskey.<em>  —Dominic Roskrow</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 96</p>
<p><strong>Sazerac Rye 18 year old, 45%, $70</strong></p>
<p>Very similar to last year’s release. Well rounded, with a gently sweet foundation (toffee, vanilla taffy), pleasant spice (cinnamon, mocha, soft evergreen), date, glazed citrus, bramble, and a gentle finish for a rye. A classic ultra-aged rye whiskey. <em>—John Hansell</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 96<br />
<strong><br />
William Larue Weller, 66.75%, $70</strong></p>
<p>No age statement, but distilled in 1998. The only wheated recipe bourbon in the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection, and a very good one at that. Higher in strength than last year’s offering (which was 63.3%), but very similar (and equally as impr<a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/BT-Antique-Collection-2011-Low-res.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9613" title="BT Antique Collection 2011 Low res" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/BT-Antique-Collection-2011-Low-res-300x221.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="221" /></a>essive). The most elegant and smoothest of this collection, with layered sweetness (honey, caramel, marzipan, maple syrup), fig, blackberry preserve, hint of green tea, and just the right amount of spice for balance (nutmeg, cinnamon, cocoa). <em>—John Hansell<br />
</em><br />
Advanced<em> <em>Whisky Advocate</em> </em>magazine rating<em>: 95</em></p>
<p><strong>George T. Stagg, 71.3%, $70</strong></p>
<p>At this strength, it’s almost like getting two whiskeys for the price of one. A great value, considering its age. (It’s not identified on the label, but was distilled in 1993.) Try to find a great 18 year old, cask-strength single malt scotch for this price. Very mature — with a good dose of oak — but not excessively so. Notes of toffee, tobacco, dark molasses, roasted nuts, dried vanilla, leather, and a hint of dusty corn. Dry on the finish, with lingering leather and tobacco. <em>—John Hansell</em></p>
<p>Advanced<em> <em>Whisky Advocate</em> </em>magazine rating<em>: 95</em><em><br />
</em><strong><br />
Aberfeldy 14 year old Single Cask, 58.1%, £115</strong></p>
<p>Single cask Aberfeldy bottlings are very few and far between, and this is a stunner! After hogshead maturation the whisky ultimately underwent a period of finishing in an ex-sherry cask prior to bottling. The nose offers sultanas, raisins, and hot chocolate. Developing vanilla and a hint of over-ripe bananas. Finally, burnt sugar and caramel. Insinuating and syrupy on the palate, with apricots, dried fruits, honey, and sherry. Gently spicy and warming, with licorice in the notably long finish.<em> —Gavin Smith</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 94<br />
<strong><br />
The Dalmore 1978, 46%, $750</strong></p>
<p>This 1978 vintage release from The Dalmore has been ‘finished’ for two years in Matusalem sherry casks from Gonzalez Byass, following 29 years in American white oak. Just 477 bottles are available. Freshly-ground coffee, marzipan, dark berries, and rich sherry on the smooth nose, with milk chocolate and Jaffa oranges. Smokier with water. Citrus fruits and more milk chocolate on the rich, full palate, plus roasted almonds. Long and juicy in the finish, with aniseed and fruit pastilles.<em> —Gavin Smith</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 93<br />
<strong><br />
Thomas H. Handy Sazerac, 64.3%, $70</strong></p>
<p>The youngster in the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection. One taste and its relative youth is confirmed. (But no worries; it’s mature enough to enjoy neat or with some water (and would be killer in cocktails). This is rye whiskey in its most vibrant, masculine, and purest form. Bold spice (fresh evergreen, warming cinnamon), honey-coated orchard fruit, golden raisin, caramel, and brandy with a crisp, clean finish. The American equivalent to a young, cask-strength, smoky Islay whisky. <em>—John Hansell</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 93<br />
<strong><br />
Eagle Rare 17 year old, 45%, $70</strong></p>
<p>The most underrated of the five in the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection, but this year’s release (like last year’s) is very lovely bourbon. Perhaps just a bit softer than last year, but with a similar profile: very even keeled and nicely balanced, with sweet notes (vanilla, toffee, <em>añejo</em> rum) peppered with soft orchard fruit and spice (cocoa, cinnamon, nutmeg, hint of mint), polished oak, and subtle tobacco. <em>—John Hansell</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 93</p>
<p><strong>Adelphi (distilled at Linkwood) 1984 26 year old, 57.6%, £94</strong></p>
<p>There are light oaked notes to start, along with Oolong tea and very subtle smoke. These then shift into a mix of cedar and scented blossom. Classic, layered elegance with the cask offering support, not dominance. The fruits have that slightly eerie quality of decay, while the palate is deep and juicy. This is an exemplary, subtle, old whisky with delicate rancio (it’s a little cognac-like), which is given a boost of extra life with a small drop of water.<em>— Dave Broom</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 92</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/29/top-ten-rated-whiskies-from-the-winter-2011-issue-of-whisky-advocate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Masterson&#8217;s Straight Rye Whiskey Batch #3</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/27/review-mastersons-straight-rye-whiskey-batch-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/27/review-mastersons-straight-rye-whiskey-batch-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 14:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masterson's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Masterson’s Straight Rye Whiskey Batch #3 10 year old, 45%, $80
The third recently released 100% rye whiskey sourced from Canada, with the others being WhistlePig (50%, $70) and Jefferson’s (47%, $40). (The one you purchase might depend on which one you can find, as they are all quite limited.)  This one sells at a premium [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/mastersons-rye-image.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9602" title="masterson's rye image" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/mastersons-rye-image-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>Masterson’s Straight Rye Whiskey Batch #3 10 year old, 45%, $80</strong></p>
<p>The third recently released 100% rye whiskey sourced from Canada, with the others being WhistlePig (50%, $70) and Jefferson’s (47%, $40). (The one you purchase might depend on which one you can find, as they are all quite limited.)  This one sells at a premium to the other two, but shows polish and is nicely rounded. Layers of sweetness (honeyed fruit, caramel, nutty toffee, maple syrup), toasted oak, cinnamon, evergreen, nutmeg, and a dusting of cocoa. Very distinctive!</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 88</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/27/review-mastersons-straight-rye-whiskey-batch-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Old Forester Birthday Bourbon</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/17/review-old-forester-birthday-bourbon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/17/review-old-forester-birthday-bourbon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown-Forman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Forester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Old Forester Birthday Bourbon 12 year old 1999, 49%, $50
Rather bold (especially with the spice notes), with dark fruit (black raspberry jam, plum), citrus glaze, vibrant spice (vanilla, cinnamon, clove), a dusting of cocoa powder, polished leather, and pencil shavings, all on a bed of caramel. Long, spicy finish.  A nice way to finish a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BdayBottle11StrghtLrg.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9529" title="BdayBottle11StrghtLrg" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BdayBottle11StrghtLrg-217x300.jpg" alt="" width="217" height="300" /></a>Old Forester Birthday Bourbon 12 year old 1999, 49%, $50</strong></p>
<p>Rather bold (especially with the spice notes), with dark fruit (black raspberry jam, plum), citrus glaze, vibrant spice (vanilla, cinnamon, clove), a dusting of cocoa powder, polished leather, and pencil shavings, all on a bed of caramel. Long, spicy finish.  A nice way to finish a rich, hearty meal, perhaps?</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 88</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/17/review-old-forester-birthday-bourbon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Elijah Craig Barrel No. 3735 20 year old</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/11/review-elijah-craig-barrel-no-3735-20-year-old/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/11/review-elijah-craig-barrel-no-3735-20-year-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elijah Craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heaven Hill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elijah Craig Barrel No. 3735 20 year old, 45%, $150
From one barrel, and only sold in one location, but well worth the effort to procure a bottle. Nutty toffee, pecan pie, apricot, berried jam, and nougat, peppered with cinnamon, mint, cocoa, and tobacco. Warming, with polished leather and dried spice on the finish.  Seamless, richly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/EC20pic.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9522" title="EC20pic" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/EC20pic-e1319479852279-224x300.jpg" alt="" width="179" height="240" /></a>Elijah Craig Barrel No. 3735 20 year old, 45%, $150</strong></p>
<p>From one barrel, and only sold in one location, but well worth the effort to procure a bottle. Nutty toffee, pecan pie, apricot, berried jam, and nougat, peppered with cinnamon, mint, cocoa, and tobacco. Warming, with polished leather and dried spice on the finish.  Seamless, richly textured, and impeccably balanced. (Exclusive to the Bourbon Heritage Center at the Heaven Hill distillery in Bardstown, KY.)</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 96</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/11/review-elijah-craig-barrel-no-3735-20-year-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Parker&#8217;s Heritage Collection Barrel Finished</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/07/review-parkers-heritage-collection-barrel-finished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/07/review-parkers-heritage-collection-barrel-finished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heaven Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parker's Heritage Collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parker’s Heritage Collection Barrel Finished 10 year old, 50%, $80
Heaven Hill’s first wood-finished bourbon. Finished for several months in cognac casks (reminiscent of Beam’s Distillers’ Masterpiece offering around a decade ago), which show nicely without dominating. Very silky and smooth in texture. Notes of graham cracker, dark fleshy fruit (ripe grape, blackberry brandy), light toffee, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Parkers-Cognac-Finished-Bourbon.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9526" title="Parkers Cognac Finished Bourbon" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Parkers-Cognac-Finished-Bourbon-112x300.png" alt="" width="112" height="300" /></a>Parker’s Heritage Collection Barrel Finished 10 year old, 50%, $80</strong></p>
<p>Heaven Hill’s first wood-finished bourbon. Finished for several months in cognac casks (reminiscent of Beam’s Distillers’ Masterpiece offering around a decade ago), which show nicely without dominating. Very silky and smooth in texture. Notes of graham cracker, dark fleshy fruit (ripe grape, blackberry brandy), light toffee, maple syrup on pancakes, and creamy vanilla. Great balance, distinctive, and perilously drinkable for 100 proof.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 91</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/07/review-parkers-heritage-collection-barrel-finished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Big Bottom Whiskey Port Cask Finish Batch #2</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/06/review-big-bottom-whiskey-port-cask-finish-batch-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/06/review-big-bottom-whiskey-port-cask-finish-batch-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Bottom Whiskey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big Bottom Whiskey Port Cask Finish Batch #2 3 year old, 45.5%, $35
A relatively high rye grain content for a bourbon (36%). The port adds richness (fleshy fruit) and helps the whiskey taste older than it really is (by masking some of its youthfulness?). Notes of ripe cherry, soft plum, mandarin orange in syrup, dates, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BigBottom.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9518" title="BigBottom" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BigBottom-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="210" /></a>Big Bottom Whiskey Port Cask Finish Batch #2 3 year old, 45.5%, $35</strong></p>
<p>A relatively high rye grain content for a bourbon (36%). The port adds richness (fleshy fruit) and helps the whiskey taste older than it really is (by masking some of its youthfulness?). Notes of ripe cherry, soft plum, mandarin orange in syrup, dates, and toffee. The spices (cinnamon, mint, and a dusting of cocoa) pick up mid-palate and finish strong and warming. A slight bit more port than I would prefer, but the spice vibrancy still shines through.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 84</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/06/review-big-bottom-whiskey-port-cask-finish-batch-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: E. H. Taylor Jr. Single Barrel</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/03/review-e-h-taylor-jr-single-barrel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/03/review-e-h-taylor-jr-single-barrel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E. H. Taylor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E. H. Taylor Jr. Single Barrel, 50%, $60
The second release in the new Taylor line by Buffalo Trace, and the first single barrel offering. Similar in personality to the first release (a small batch offering), but a shade darker in color, flavor, and personality. A bit more intense, too, with more mouthfeel, and not as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/EHT-Single-Barrel-Winter-2011.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9515" title="EHT Single Barrel Winter 2011" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/EHT-Single-Barrel-Winter-2011-180x300.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="300" /></a>E. H. Taylor Jr. Single Barrel, 50%, $60</strong></p>
<p>The second release in the new Taylor line by Buffalo Trace, and the first single barrel offering. Similar in personality to the first release (a small batch offering), but a shade darker in color, flavor, and personality. A bit more intense, too, with more mouthfeel, and not as demure. A fair trade-off. Starts off sweet (rummy, burnt dark fruit, fig cake) then becomes dry, with dried spice, tobacco, toasted oak, and leather. Very exciting and distinctive.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 88</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/03/review-e-h-taylor-jr-single-barrel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Buffalo Trace Antique Collection 2011 Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/01/review-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2011-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/01/review-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2011-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace Antique Collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We still have no power at the Whisky Advocate offices in PA, thanks to the record-breaking snow storm. But, since tonight is WhiskyFest New York, we are in New York where there is power, Internet access, and WHISKEY! So, I am finally able to post a review.
The eagerly awaited annual release from Buffalo Trace distillery [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">We still have no power at the <em>Whisky Advocate</em> offices in PA, thanks to the record-breaking snow storm. But, since tonight is WhiskyFest New York, we are in New York where there is power, Internet access, and WHISKEY! So, I am finally able to post a review.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The eagerly awaited annual release from Buffalo Trace distillery is out. Last year’s release was one of their best. This year is a repeat performance. Well done!<br />
<a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BT-AntCollection-2011-low-res.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9495 alignright" title="BT AntCollection 2011 low res" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BT-AntCollection-2011-low-res-300x221.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="221" /> </a></p>
<p><strong>Sazerac Rye 18 year old, 45%, $70</strong></p>
<p>Very similar to last year’s release. Well rounded, with a gently sweet foundation (toffee, vanilla taffy), pleasant spice (cinnamon, mocha, soft evergreen), date, glazed citrus, bramble, and a gentle finish for a rye. A classic ultra-aged rye whiskey.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 96</p>
<p><strong>William Larue Weller, 66.75%, $70</strong></p>
<p>No age statement, but distilled in 1998. The only wheated recipe bourbon in the bunch, and a very good one at that. Higher in strength than last year’s offering (which was 63.3%), but very similar (and equally as impressive). The most elegant and smoothest of this collection, with layered sweetness (honey, caramel, marzipan, maple syrup), fig, blackberry preserve, hint of green tea, and just the right amount of spice for balance (nutmeg, cinnamon, cocoa).</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 95</p>
<p><strong>George T. Stagg, 71.3%, $70</strong></p>
<p>At this strength, it’s almost like getting two whiskeys for the price of one. A great value, considering its age. (It’s not identified on the label, but was distilled in 1993.) Try to find a great 18 year old, cask-strength single malt scotch for this price. Very mature — with a good dose of oak — but not excessively so. Notes of toffee, tobacco, dark molasses, roasted nuts, dried vanilla, leather, and a hint of dusty corn. Dry on the finish, with lingering leather and tobacco.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 95</p>
<p><strong>Thomas H. Handy Sazerac, 64.3%, $70</strong></p>
<p>The youngster in the family. One taste and its relative youth is confirmed. (But no worries; it’s mature enough to enjoy neat or with some water (and would be a killer in cocktails). This is rye whiskey in its most vibrant, masculine, and purest form. Bold spice (fresh evergreen, warming cinnamon), honey-coated orchard fruit, golden raisin, caramel, and brandy with a crisp, clean finish. The American equivalent to a young, cask-strength, smoky Islay whisky.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 93</p>
<p><strong>Eagle Rare 17 year old, 45%, $70</strong></p>
<p>The most underrated of the five in the collection, but this year’s release (like last year’s) is very lovely bourbon. Perhaps just a bit softer than last year, but with a similar profile: very even keeled and nicely balanced, with sweet notes (vanilla, toffee, <em>añejo</em> rum) peppered with soft orchard fruit and spice (cocoa, cinnamon, nutmeg, hint of mint), polished oak, and subtle tobacco.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate </em>magazine rating: 93</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/11/01/review-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2011-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Bruichladdich 10 year old</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/26/review-bruichladdich-10-year-old/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/26/review-bruichladdich-10-year-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruichladdich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruichladdich 10 year old, 46%, $57
The first 10 year old distilled by the current owners back in 2001. Lovely marriage of both bourbon and sherry casks, and quite fresh, with a maturity resembling a 12 year old, rather than 10. Smooth on the palate, and very drinkable, with creamy vanilla, honeycomb, banana bread, bright lemon, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Bruichladdich-10-YO-low-res.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9511" title="Bruichladdich 10 YO low res" src="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Bruichladdich-10-YO-low-res-233x300.jpg" alt="" width="233" height="300" /></a>Bruichladdich 10 year old, 46%, $57</strong></p>
<p>The first 10 year old distilled by the current owners back in 2001. Lovely marriage of both bourbon and sherry casks, and quite fresh, with a maturity resembling a 12 year old, rather than 10. Smooth on the palate, and very drinkable, with creamy vanilla, honeycomb, banana bread, bright lemon, melon (honeydew, cantaloupe), tangerine, candied ginger, and delicate brine. With all the Bruichladdich razzle-dazzle over the past decade, we can embrace this unpretentiously delicious Laddie with open arms.</p>
<p>Advanced <em>Whisky Advocate</em> magazine rating: 90</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/26/review-bruichladdich-10-year-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some new whiskies I&#8217;ve been enjoying</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/13/some-new-whiskies-ive-been-enjoying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/13/some-new-whiskies-ive-been-enjoying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bourbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Bottler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rye whiskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisky Advocate Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardbeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruichladdich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compass Box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elijah Craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heaven Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kilkerran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pappy Van Winkle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parker's Heritage Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samaroli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shackleton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewhiskyadvocateblog.com/?p=9417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was in San Francisco most of last week hosting WhiskyFest (More on that in a bit). We&#8217;re gearing up for our New York WhiskyFest which is only a couple weeks away. In the interim, we&#8217;ve got to put together the Winter issue of Whisky Advocate. So, if you&#8217;re wondering where I&#8217;ve been lately, now you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in San Francisco most of last week hosting <a href="http://www.thewhiskyadvocate.com/whiskyfest_san_francisco.asp">WhiskyFest </a>(More on that in a bit). We&#8217;re gearing up for our New York WhiskyFest which is only a couple weeks away. In the interim, we&#8217;ve got to put together the Winter issue of <em>Whisky Advocate</em>. So, if you&#8217;re wondering where I&#8217;ve been lately, now you know. This is the busiest time of the year for me. The moment I get some free time, I will post something up here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been tasting a lot of whiskies lately. Formal reviews will follow for most of them. But, in the interim, so you can get a jump on your autumn whisky-buying, I&#8217;ll let you know my informal thoughts now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thewhiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Bruichladdich-10-year-old.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9427" title="Bruichladdich 10 year old" src="http://www.thewhiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Bruichladdich-10-year-old-226x300.jpg" alt="" width="226" height="300" /></a>I was able to taste the new <strong>Bruichladdich 10 year old</strong> at WhiskyFest. (It&#8217;s not in the U.S. yet, but the importer brought me a sample.) As you may know, this is the first 10 year old whisky being sold that was produced by the current owners. It&#8217;s a new dawn for Bruichladdich, and I am happy to say that this whisky is <em>very</em> good. Most of it is from bourbon barrels, but there&#8217;s some sherry casks thrown in too. I just hope they can keep this profile consistant going forward. If they do, it could become the go-to entry level non-smoky Island whisky (competing with Highland Park 12 year old and Bunnahabhain 12 year old  for that honor). To me, it tastes like a 12 year old whisky.</p>
<p>Another whisky that surprised me was the <strong>Kilkerran WIP (Work In Progress) 3rd release</strong>. If memory serves me correctly, it&#8217;s 7 years old and tasted surprisingly fresh and also nicely mature for its age.</p>
<p>Dr. Bill Lumsden, after his Ardbeg seminar, let me sample a <strong>1975 Ardbeg</strong> from a sample bottle (Cask #4714) from a refill sherry cask which I thought was outstanding! My favorite whisky of the night. He said they&#8217;ve been using so much from this cask at whisky shows, they won&#8217;t have much left when it is bottled. But let me put it this way: when it&#8217;s bottled, I am buying a bottle (if it doesn&#8217;t cost me an arm and a leg).</p>
<p>I tried some of the <strong>Samaroli</strong> releases. This independent bottler is new to the U.S. I tasted a <strong>1967 Tomintoul</strong> and a <strong>34 year old Glenlivet</strong> which were delicious. (The Glenlivet was not identified as such&#8211;it had a false name which I didn&#8217;t write down. I&#8217;ll try to dig that one up and let you know what it was called.). I&#8217;m not sure what the prices and availability of these whiskies will be at this time. Details to follow.</p>
<p>I have a bottle of the <strong>Shackleton</strong> whisky, which I have really been enjoying over the past couple of weeks. Very distinctive for a blend, and with plenty of character. Dominic Roskrow rated it in the lown 90s for us, and I would probably have given it at least a 90 myself if I formally reviewed it.</p>
<p>Another new blended scotch I really like for its drinkability and versatility is <strong>Compass Box&#8217;s Great King Street</strong>. It&#8217;s not going to set your world on fire, but it was never intended to do so. That&#8217;s what whiskies like Peat Monster are for. Whiskymaker John Glaser continues to impress me.</p>
<p>For the bourbon enthusiasts out there, I&#8217;ve been through the new <strong>Buffalo Trace Antique Collection</strong> a few times already. It&#8217;s just hitting the shelves now. The entire line is stellar&#8211;as it was last year, and they taste very similar to last year&#8217;s release. So, if you liked last year&#8217;s offering, you can be confident that you will like this year&#8217;s releases if you have a chance to buy them. (They are always hard to come by.)</p>
<p>Heaven Hill has two really nice whiskeys that just came out. This year&#8217;s <strong>Parker&#8217;s Heritage Collection</strong> is a 10 year old, 100 proof bourbon finished in Cognac barrels (similar to the old Beam Distillers&#8217; Masterpiece bottling). The cognac doesn&#8217;t dominate, adds intrigue, and this whisky is dangerously drinkable for 100 proof. But, if you are a purist (dare I say stubborn?), and don&#8217;t want people meddling with your bourbon, you might think differently about this offering.</p>
<p>The second whiskey from Heaven Hill is a <strong>Elijah Craig 20 year old single cask</strong> bottling (Cask #3735). The good news: I love this whiskey, and will be rating it in the mid 90s. The bad news: it&#8217;s only available at Heaven Hill&#8217;s Bourbon Heritage Center in Bardstown, KY, and it will set you back $150.</p>
<p>Finally, for those of you who are budget-minded, I tasted my way through the <strong>Pappy Van Winkle</strong> line of bourbons (12, 15, 20 and 23 year old). My favorite? The 15 year old. Save your money and get this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/10/13/some-new-whiskies-ive-been-enjoying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Balblair 1995</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/20/review-balblair-1995-46-80-1-liter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/20/review-balblair-1995-46-80-1-liter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balblair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=9299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Balblair 1995, 46%, $80 (1 liter)
The latest Balblair release is a 1995 vintage expression, exclusive to global travel retail outlets. Matured in second-fill bourbon casks, Balblair 1995 is non-chill filtered and naturally colored. Initially very fruity on the nose, with peaches and carnations, icing sugar on bonbons, then a faint sprinkling of black pepper. Stewed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Balblair 1995, 46%, $80 (1 liter)</strong></p>
<p>The latest Balblair release is a 1995 vintage expression, exclusive to global travel retail outlets. Matured in second-fill bourbon casks, Balblair 1995 is non-chill filtered and naturally colored. Initially very fruity on the nose, with peaches and carnations, icing sugar on bonbons, then a faint sprinkling of black pepper. Stewed fruits on the early palate, full and confident, with developing spices and brittle toffee. Relatively lengthy in the finish, with dark chocolate and soft oak.<em> —Gavin Smith</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Malt Advocate</em> magazine rating: 91</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/20/review-balblair-1995-46-80-1-liter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Longmorn 16 year old</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/19/review-longmorn-16-year-old-48-110/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/19/review-longmorn-16-year-old-48-110/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longmorn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=9288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Longmorn 16 year old, 48%, $110
Longmorn may be slightly better known than some, but it’s still pretty much a cult whisky — with a huge following in Japan, where every whisky bar seems to have multiple expressions. This bottling shows it in its lushest guise, with masses of caramelized soft fruits, banana, cream toffee, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Longmorn-16-YO.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9289" title="Longmorn 16 YO" src="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Longmorn-16-YO-117x300.jpg" alt="" width="117" height="300" /></a>Longmorn 16 year old, 48%, $110</strong></p>
<p>Longmorn may be slightly better known than some, but it’s still pretty much a cult whisky — with a huge following in Japan, where every whisky bar seems to have multiple expressions. This bottling shows it in its lushest guise, with masses of caramelized soft fruits, banana, cream toffee, and chocolate. The palate shifts between raisin and plum. Elegant.<em> —Dave Broom</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Malt Advocate </em>magazine rating: 89</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/19/review-longmorn-16-year-old-48-110/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Amrut Portonova</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/16/review-amrut-portonova-61-2-125/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/16/review-amrut-portonova-61-2-125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indian whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amrut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=9313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amrut Portonova, 61.2%, $125
This release is a port version of Amrut’s Intermediate Sherry — a sort of port pipe sandwich. The spirit is matured in both unused casks and bourbon casks, then spends a few months in port pipes, and then returns to bourbon casks. The result is a Pink Floyd show of a whisky: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amrut Portonova, 61.2%, $125</p>
<p>This release is a port version of Amrut’s Intermediate Sherry — a sort of port pipe sandwich. The spirit is matured in both unused casks and bourbon casks, then spends a few months in port pipes, and then returns to bourbon casks. The result is a Pink Floyd show of a whisky: vibrant, colorful, complex, and nearly too much. A blackcurrant and wispy, smoky nose gives way to an intense and bittersweet mix of chili, blackcurrant, oak, damson, dark chocolate, and peat. Astounding.<em> —Dominic Roskrow</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Malt Advocate </em>magazine rating: 92</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/16/review-amrut-portonova-61-2-125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Hazelburn 12 year old</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/15/review-hazelburn-12-year-old-46-80/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/15/review-hazelburn-12-year-old-46-80/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazelburn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=9295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hazelburn 12 year old, 46%, $80
Following on from the earlier 8 year old expression of this triple distilled Campbeltown malt, the 12 year old first appeared in August 2009 and nicely illustrates the developments brought about by its continuing maturation. Rich on the nose, with a clear sherry influence, along with toffee, marzipan, apricots, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hazelburn 12 year old, 46%, $80<a href="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Hazelburn-12-YO.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-9296" title="Hazelburn 12 YO" src="http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Hazelburn-12-YO.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="240" /></a></strong></p>
<p>Following on from the earlier 8 year old expression of this triple distilled Campbeltown malt, the 12 year old first appeared in August 2009 and nicely illustrates the developments brought about by its continuing maturation. Rich on the nose, with a clear sherry influence, along with toffee, marzipan, apricots, and milk chocolate. This is a substantial and well integrated dram, with malt, almonds, cocoa, and spice on the palate, while the long, spicy finish offers more chocolate, soft fruits, and coffee.<em> —Gavin Smith</em></p>
<p>Advanced <em>Malt Advocate </em>magazine rating: 87</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2011/09/15/review-hazelburn-12-year-old-46-80/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

