<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Irish whiskey, really?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:43:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kallaskander</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-21358</link>
		<dc:creator>kallaskander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-21358</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

another clue what Irish whiskey might be.

http://www.irishwhiskeynotes.com/2010/03/new-whiskeys-from-kilbeggan.html

&quot;Once the mash tuns are in place, the distillery plans, according to manager Brian Quinn, to try out the old Locke&#039;s mashbill of 60% malted barley, 35% unmalted barley and 5% oats.&quot;

Back to the roots!

Greetings
kallaskander</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>another clue what Irish whiskey might be.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irishwhiskeynotes.com/2010/03/new-whiskeys-from-kilbeggan.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.irishwhiskeynotes.com/2010/03/new-whiskeys-from-kilbeggan.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Once the mash tuns are in place, the distillery plans, according to manager Brian Quinn, to try out the old Locke&#8217;s mashbill of 60% malted barley, 35% unmalted barley and 5% oats.&#8221;</p>
<p>Back to the roots!</p>
<p>Greetings<br />
kallaskander</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-21340</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-21340</guid>
		<description>My Nebraska bar was limited to two bottles, and I heard there were only a few cases in the state. For the money, I think it is no better than Powers, but I would gladly take a Knappogue or Redbreast over Paddys any day. 

I have been told the limited availability has something to do with Pernod-Ricards concern over biting into their own market share. Sell one more bottle of Paddy, sell one less bottle of JJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Nebraska bar was limited to two bottles, and I heard there were only a few cases in the state. For the money, I think it is no better than Powers, but I would gladly take a Knappogue or Redbreast over Paddys any day. </p>
<p>I have been told the limited availability has something to do with Pernod-Ricards concern over biting into their own market share. Sell one more bottle of Paddy, sell one less bottle of JJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobo</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-21107</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-21107</guid>
		<description>Hi JC,

Do you have to know how a product is made? I think it is enough to judge it by its characteristics (taste)....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JC,</p>
<p>Do you have to know how a product is made? I think it is enough to judge it by its characteristics (taste)&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: booka</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20834</link>
		<dc:creator>booka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20834</guid>
		<description>Do they also differ in the type of still - pot vs column?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they also differ in the type of still &#8211; pot vs column?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20776</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20776</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

To be blunt I think Irish whiskey is a sad shell of its former self. Yes there are still some great whiskies coming from that Island, but with only 3, some might say 4 distilleries, Ireland is a land that has lost touch with its whiskey distilling roots! Regardless of the reasons for its contraction in the 20th century--Irish Civil War, the Great Depression, Prohibition and others--the Irish whiskey industry has become separated from place, tradition and history. Bushmills is the only Irish whisky which has managed to keep its identity, and to me it is the only one which still has an authentic feel. The iconic brands distilled at Middleton are just that, brands, brands produced by one distillery under one roof. Yes there are different styles, the names of long lost distilleries persist, and some of the traditional techniques have been preserved but much more has been lost. 

Whereas in Ireland there are only 3 active full time distilleries, there are over 100 in Scotland. To me this is the most striking fact. Scotland has done a much better job of protecting its tradition and heritage with respect to distilling (whether by design or not). There is a sense of mystique and place about the Scottish distilleries and their whiskies that those of Ireland have mostly lost.

It&#039;s great to see what&#039;s being done at Cooley, and I wish them the best of luck with Kilbeggan too. Hopefully we will see a return to Ireland&#039;s distilling roots; the creation of new distilleries and the revival of some old ones. Short of that all we have to look forward to is another brand from the same &quot;not so old&quot; distillery!

Slainte!

Andrew Ferguson
Calgary, Canada</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>To be blunt I think Irish whiskey is a sad shell of its former self. Yes there are still some great whiskies coming from that Island, but with only 3, some might say 4 distilleries, Ireland is a land that has lost touch with its whiskey distilling roots! Regardless of the reasons for its contraction in the 20th century&#8211;Irish Civil War, the Great Depression, Prohibition and others&#8211;the Irish whiskey industry has become separated from place, tradition and history. Bushmills is the only Irish whisky which has managed to keep its identity, and to me it is the only one which still has an authentic feel. The iconic brands distilled at Middleton are just that, brands, brands produced by one distillery under one roof. Yes there are different styles, the names of long lost distilleries persist, and some of the traditional techniques have been preserved but much more has been lost. </p>
<p>Whereas in Ireland there are only 3 active full time distilleries, there are over 100 in Scotland. To me this is the most striking fact. Scotland has done a much better job of protecting its tradition and heritage with respect to distilling (whether by design or not). There is a sense of mystique and place about the Scottish distilleries and their whiskies that those of Ireland have mostly lost.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to see what&#8217;s being done at Cooley, and I wish them the best of luck with Kilbeggan too. Hopefully we will see a return to Ireland&#8217;s distilling roots; the creation of new distilleries and the revival of some old ones. Short of that all we have to look forward to is another brand from the same &#8220;not so old&#8221; distillery!</p>
<p>Slainte!</p>
<p>Andrew Ferguson<br />
Calgary, Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawschooldrunk</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20638</link>
		<dc:creator>lawschooldrunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20638</guid>
		<description>What is Irish Whiskey? Irish Whiskey is CHEAPER and thank heavens, is still underrated.  Keep your hands off the prices, industry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Irish Whiskey? Irish Whiskey is CHEAPER and thank heavens, is still underrated.  Keep your hands off the prices, industry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC Skinner</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20559</link>
		<dc:creator>JC Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20559</guid>
		<description>While poitin was historically the term used for illicit whiskey, it was also the term used for unaged whiskey.
It&#039;s not the case that poitin cannot be licit. It&#039;s been legal for 13 years now, and both Bunratty and Knockeen Hills have licit versions on the market currently.
I can see why Midleton or Bushmills mightn&#039;t want to sell their unaged spirit (and they don&#039;t.) But with Kilbeggan coming back after so long, there was a huge interest in what the spirit would be like and they did indeed release some.
I just think calling it Kilbeggan poitin would have been a classy touch is all. Interestingly, poitin DOES have a legally protected status in European law, whereas terms like &#039;Irish pure potstill&#039; do not.
I&#039;m familiar with the Cooley history you cite, but it does no harm to spread that information a little wider. A lot of people don&#039;t realise how difficult it was for Cooley at certain stages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While poitin was historically the term used for illicit whiskey, it was also the term used for unaged whiskey.<br />
It&#8217;s not the case that poitin cannot be licit. It&#8217;s been legal for 13 years now, and both Bunratty and Knockeen Hills have licit versions on the market currently.<br />
I can see why Midleton or Bushmills mightn&#8217;t want to sell their unaged spirit (and they don&#8217;t.) But with Kilbeggan coming back after so long, there was a huge interest in what the spirit would be like and they did indeed release some.<br />
I just think calling it Kilbeggan poitin would have been a classy touch is all. Interestingly, poitin DOES have a legally protected status in European law, whereas terms like &#8216;Irish pure potstill&#8217; do not.<br />
I&#8217;m familiar with the Cooley history you cite, but it does no harm to spread that information a little wider. A lot of people don&#8217;t realise how difficult it was for Cooley at certain stages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kallaskander</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20558</link>
		<dc:creator>kallaskander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20558</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

not so much a missed opportunty but common sense. Poitin is an undeclared illicit distilled whiskey same as moonshine.

There is no way to bottle it and bring it ot the shelves in stores. As soon as it is taxed it is no longer poitin.

When the state took care of taxing potin the taxed spirit was called &quot;parliament whiskey&quot; in Ireland to make a difference from the real stuff.

You know, freedom an whiskey gang tagither.

As for Cooley and the question of defining or re-defining whiskey...

If you ask John Tealing he will probably tell you the story how IDL and her French mother tried to prevent him from starting Cooley.
With their monopole on everything in connection with Irish whiskey from distillers equipment to the barley market John was not able to obtain even the smallest item you need to start a distillery.

So he looked to Scotland. So much that he hired a Scottish master distiller. Soon after he had established Cooley IDL appeared at his doorstep with wallet in the hands and wanted to buy him out. Irish pride and the Irish anti trust legislation prevented that.

In the aftermath of all that Cooley took to calling ther malts made in the Scottish style &quot;pure pot still whiskey&quot; to emphasize that they were made in pot stills - and probavly to create confusion I am afraid.

And they opened the bottle of questions concerning the definition of Irish whiskey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>not so much a missed opportunty but common sense. Poitin is an undeclared illicit distilled whiskey same as moonshine.</p>
<p>There is no way to bottle it and bring it ot the shelves in stores. As soon as it is taxed it is no longer poitin.</p>
<p>When the state took care of taxing potin the taxed spirit was called &#8220;parliament whiskey&#8221; in Ireland to make a difference from the real stuff.</p>
<p>You know, freedom an whiskey gang tagither.</p>
<p>As for Cooley and the question of defining or re-defining whiskey&#8230;</p>
<p>If you ask John Tealing he will probably tell you the story how IDL and her French mother tried to prevent him from starting Cooley.<br />
With their monopole on everything in connection with Irish whiskey from distillers equipment to the barley market John was not able to obtain even the smallest item you need to start a distillery.</p>
<p>So he looked to Scotland. So much that he hired a Scottish master distiller. Soon after he had established Cooley IDL appeared at his doorstep with wallet in the hands and wanted to buy him out. Irish pride and the Irish anti trust legislation prevented that.</p>
<p>In the aftermath of all that Cooley took to calling ther malts made in the Scottish style &#8220;pure pot still whiskey&#8221; to emphasize that they were made in pot stills &#8211; and probavly to create confusion I am afraid.</p>
<p>And they opened the bottle of questions concerning the definition of Irish whiskey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chef!</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20553</link>
		<dc:creator>chef!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20553</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;m torn on this issue and have a double standard. When it comes to whisk(e)y what matters to me is that there&#039;s contiguity in the base distillate and distillation processes (pot, column, combo, etc) and not so much thereafter unless drastic. Yet what defines the very differences between some other spirits is the very last step of finishing from maceration to even adding small amounts of sugar. 

If a whisky is ACE&#039;d in a wine barrel or uses a special stave does it go outside the boundaries? For me, no it does not because the base distilled material is 100% grain derived. That&#039;s just me in terms of whisk(e)y. I&#039;m all for a simple definition of what a country and its distillers decide. Less to memorize in regard giving a broad definition to a region&#039;s style, but then again a lot more to memorize for each specific distillery. I&#039;m all for innovation so long as what ends up in my glass is tasty and worth the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m torn on this issue and have a double standard. When it comes to whisk(e)y what matters to me is that there&#8217;s contiguity in the base distillate and distillation processes (pot, column, combo, etc) and not so much thereafter unless drastic. Yet what defines the very differences between some other spirits is the very last step of finishing from maceration to even adding small amounts of sugar. </p>
<p>If a whisky is ACE&#8217;d in a wine barrel or uses a special stave does it go outside the boundaries? For me, no it does not because the base distilled material is 100% grain derived. That&#8217;s just me in terms of whisk(e)y. I&#8217;m all for a simple definition of what a country and its distillers decide. Less to memorize in regard giving a broad definition to a region&#8217;s style, but then again a lot more to memorize for each specific distillery. I&#8217;m all for innovation so long as what ends up in my glass is tasty and worth the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC Skinner</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20502</link>
		<dc:creator>JC Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20502</guid>
		<description>@Davin: I agree. You don&#039;t want to throw out the baby with the bathwater by defining away all possible experimentation. But at the same time, is it not fooling the consumer to label a whiskey &#039;pure potstill&#039; when it isn&#039;t?
@Chuck: Utterly agree. In Ireland the term for unaged (and often untaxed!) whiskey historically has been poitin (or poteen, or potcheen for the anglophones).
They only legalised poitin in the last few years (Bunratty do a weak version) but I&#039;d like to see the Irish distillers releasing their unaged spirit as branded poitin. I was disappointed when Kilbeggan released theirs as &#039;spirit&#039; - a missed opportunity there, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Davin: I agree. You don&#8217;t want to throw out the baby with the bathwater by defining away all possible experimentation. But at the same time, is it not fooling the consumer to label a whiskey &#8216;pure potstill&#8217; when it isn&#8217;t?<br />
@Chuck: Utterly agree. In Ireland the term for unaged (and often untaxed!) whiskey historically has been poitin (or poteen, or potcheen for the anglophones).<br />
They only legalised poitin in the last few years (Bunratty do a weak version) but I&#8217;d like to see the Irish distillers releasing their unaged spirit as branded poitin. I was disappointed when Kilbeggan released theirs as &#8216;spirit&#8217; &#8211; a missed opportunity there, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davindek</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20472</link>
		<dc:creator>Davindek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20472</guid>
		<description>Yes, Spice Tree, isn&#039;t that bizarre? And yet as much as 7 or 8 litres of the liquid that flows out of every barrel of whisky finished in a wine cask is actually grape-derived spirit and flavour and no one bats an eye.  Whatever happened to just three ingredients?  You can add 7 or 8 litres of wine, no problem ,but if you add a teaspoon of Kininvie to a barrel of Glenfiddich it&#039;s no longer a single malt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Spice Tree, isn&#8217;t that bizarre? And yet as much as 7 or 8 litres of the liquid that flows out of every barrel of whisky finished in a wine cask is actually grape-derived spirit and flavour and no one bats an eye.  Whatever happened to just three ingredients?  You can add 7 or 8 litres of wine, no problem ,but if you add a teaspoon of Kininvie to a barrel of Glenfiddich it&#8217;s no longer a single malt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbart</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20469</link>
		<dc:creator>jbart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20469</guid>
		<description>As someone fairly new to scotch compared to many drinkers here, I had little idea what I was drinking until I actually did a lot of research. So I didn&#039;t exactly find Scotch easy to understand when I started out. In some ways, it still seems complicated to the uninitiated. That&#039;s why I am not always a big fan of strict rules.It works with scotch, but as the Spice tree brouhaha shows, these rules can sometimes seem to discourage innovation.

As for Irish whiskey, I don&#039;t see any problem with there being no defined style as long as the quality continues to increase and more variety becomes available. I love variety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone fairly new to scotch compared to many drinkers here, I had little idea what I was drinking until I actually did a lot of research. So I didn&#8217;t exactly find Scotch easy to understand when I started out. In some ways, it still seems complicated to the uninitiated. That&#8217;s why I am not always a big fan of strict rules.It works with scotch, but as the Spice tree brouhaha shows, these rules can sometimes seem to discourage innovation.</p>
<p>As for Irish whiskey, I don&#8217;t see any problem with there being no defined style as long as the quality continues to increase and more variety becomes available. I love variety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Cowdery</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20466</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Cowdery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20466</guid>
		<description>Whiskey-making in America is about 250 years old. In Japan it&#039;s about 140 years old. Many of the other countries that make whiskey have long distilling traditions but their whiskey-making origins are modern. Only the Irish and Scots have traditions that go back many centuries. Clarity of terminology is good, but we don&#039;t want rules that tend to fix the fly in amber. For example, in the EU (but not the USA) the term &#039;whiskey&#039; cannot be applied to any beverage that has spent less than three years in wood, even though common (i.e. un-aged) whiskey has a long and venerable history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whiskey-making in America is about 250 years old. In Japan it&#8217;s about 140 years old. Many of the other countries that make whiskey have long distilling traditions but their whiskey-making origins are modern. Only the Irish and Scots have traditions that go back many centuries. Clarity of terminology is good, but we don&#8217;t want rules that tend to fix the fly in amber. For example, in the EU (but not the USA) the term &#8216;whiskey&#8217; cannot be applied to any beverage that has spent less than three years in wood, even though common (i.e. un-aged) whiskey has a long and venerable history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davindek</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20445</link>
		<dc:creator>Davindek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20445</guid>
		<description>Hi JC,
Well, if you want them all to be sort of the same, cool, make a rule.  But if you want new flavour experiences and enjoy whisky for it&#039;s range of flavours , rather than being easy to predict, comprehend or explain, I say let anarchy reign.  We&#039;ve seen so much rule-led dumbing-down of some Scotches lately.  If we let the distillers do as they will, the good ones will prosper on their reputation and the others will fade away.  Go ahead, define Pure Pot, Single Malt, Blended, and so on, but do it in a way that encourages experimentation and variety.
Davin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JC,<br />
Well, if you want them all to be sort of the same, cool, make a rule.  But if you want new flavour experiences and enjoy whisky for it&#8217;s range of flavours , rather than being easy to predict, comprehend or explain, I say let anarchy reign.  We&#8217;ve seen so much rule-led dumbing-down of some Scotches lately.  If we let the distillers do as they will, the good ones will prosper on their reputation and the others will fade away.  Go ahead, define Pure Pot, Single Malt, Blended, and so on, but do it in a way that encourages experimentation and variety.<br />
Davin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/12/what-is-irish-whiskey/#comment-20443</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=4066#comment-20443</guid>
		<description>Yes it does. Thanks John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it does. Thanks John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

