<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The verdict on reviewing the Manager&#8217;s Choice whisky samples</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfandwhisky</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-20053</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfandwhisky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-20053</guid>
		<description>New idea:  WDJK/MA Reader Reviews.  

Take those samples you don&#039;t plan on reviewing and send them out to readers, with a sub-blog for reader tasting notes.  

I&#039;ll volunteer, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New idea:  WDJK/MA Reader Reviews.  </p>
<p>Take those samples you don&#8217;t plan on reviewing and send them out to readers, with a sub-blog for reader tasting notes.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll volunteer, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgulien</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19906</link>
		<dc:creator>bgulien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19906</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very political compromise. And very welcome. 
I think nobody is in a hurry to hear if they are any good, but most of the yes voters are still curious.
You could be a politician ;-)
And the very best with that scan. I suffer from a bad knee too. Have to walk with a stick. 
The wrist action however is superb!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very political compromise. And very welcome.<br />
I think nobody is in a hurry to hear if they are any good, but most of the yes voters are still curious.<br />
You could be a politician <img src='http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And the very best with that scan. I suffer from a bad knee too. Have to walk with a stick.<br />
The wrist action however is superb!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19881</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19881</guid>
		<description>I felt that this was a good compromise. I am trying to be understanding to the number of people who actually wanted me to review them--1/3 of you. I don&#039;t think I should just ignore them completely. I&#039;m trying my best to appeal to as many WDJK readers as possible. 

I never feel obliged to review anybody&#039;s whisky. My only obligation is to you (my WDJK followers). Probably every whisky company out there has sent me samples that I have never reviewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt that this was a good compromise. I am trying to be understanding to the number of people who actually wanted me to review them&#8211;1/3 of you. I don&#8217;t think I should just ignore them completely. I&#8217;m trying my best to appeal to as many WDJK readers as possible. </p>
<p>I never feel obliged to review anybody&#8217;s whisky. My only obligation is to you (my WDJK followers). Probably every whisky company out there has sent me samples that I have never reviewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19862</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19862</guid>
		<description>John, Good compromise.   Hope things turn out well with the knee.  Maybe just some rehab?  I am in Alice Springs, Australia now.  Saw the JW Double Black in Sydney, but was miserable with a cold and Duty Free was a mad house so I just went through customs and got to the hotel.  I may pick some up on the way back if I can figure how to pack it well in my soft checked baggage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, Good compromise.   Hope things turn out well with the knee.  Maybe just some rehab?  I am in Alice Springs, Australia now.  Saw the JW Double Black in Sydney, but was miserable with a cold and Duty Free was a mad house so I just went through customs and got to the hotel.  I may pick some up on the way back if I can figure how to pack it well in my soft checked baggage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19861</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19861</guid>
		<description>Some people would give an arm and a leg to have your job.  hopefully you don&#039;t have to do both of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people would give an arm and a leg to have your job.  hopefully you don&#8217;t have to do both of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrTH</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19857</link>
		<dc:creator>MrTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19857</guid>
		<description>Knees, ay yi yi.  I had both shoulders done a couple years ago, and am glad I didn&#039;t do it 25 years ago, when I first had trouble.  You couldn&#039;t even find the scars.  Knee surgery has progressed similarly, of course...but I don&#039;t have to walk on my shoulders.  Best of luck.  Do the rehab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knees, ay yi yi.  I had both shoulders done a couple years ago, and am glad I didn&#8217;t do it 25 years ago, when I first had trouble.  You couldn&#8217;t even find the scars.  Knee surgery has progressed similarly, of course&#8230;but I don&#8217;t have to walk on my shoulders.  Best of luck.  Do the rehab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrTH</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19856</link>
		<dc:creator>MrTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19856</guid>
		<description>I think that, on the contrary, John went above and beyond here.  Undoubtedly the vehemence of the reaction to this line of bottlings caught him by surprise, which led him to ask how we felt about it.  Consultation is one thing; in the end, he has to do what he thinks makes sense.  There is certainly no obligation to adhere to a majority vote, and it&#039;s probably pretty silly to try to reduce an issue that raises such complex emotional reaction to a black-and-white, yes-or-no conclusion, anyway.  John&#039;s ultimate decision on how to handle this might be different from what I would do, or what the majority vote would indicate, but that doesn&#039;t make it wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that, on the contrary, John went above and beyond here.  Undoubtedly the vehemence of the reaction to this line of bottlings caught him by surprise, which led him to ask how we felt about it.  Consultation is one thing; in the end, he has to do what he thinks makes sense.  There is certainly no obligation to adhere to a majority vote, and it&#8217;s probably pretty silly to try to reduce an issue that raises such complex emotional reaction to a black-and-white, yes-or-no conclusion, anyway.  John&#8217;s ultimate decision on how to handle this might be different from what I would do, or what the majority vote would indicate, but that doesn&#8217;t make it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blog #73: Laphroaig Plays Up Maker&#8217;s Mark Relationships and 14 New Tasting Notes &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19854</link>
		<dc:creator>Best in Blog #73: Laphroaig Plays Up Maker&#8217;s Mark Relationships and 14 New Tasting Notes &#124; Whisky Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19854</guid>
		<description>[...] Hansell, after polling his readers, has decided to review the second round of the &#8220;controversial&#8221; Manager&#8217;s Choice drams from Diageo &#8211; though only after reviewing some considerably more affordable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hansell, after polling his readers, has decided to review the second round of the &#8220;controversial&#8221; Manager&#8217;s Choice drams from Diageo &#8211; though only after reviewing some considerably more affordable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whiskeyminis</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19850</link>
		<dc:creator>Whiskeyminis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19850</guid>
		<description>Just remembered; if you hate surgery this video might help.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feRzVjvjYU0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just remembered; if you hate surgery this video might help.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feRzVjvjYU0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feRzVjvjYU0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam k</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19849</link>
		<dc:creator>sam k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19849</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine says that knees are proof there is no God...he would never make something that faulty.  Mine are both shot.  Good luck, brother!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine says that knees are proof there is no God&#8230;he would never make something that faulty.  Mine are both shot.  Good luck, brother!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiskeyminis</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19845</link>
		<dc:creator>whiskeyminis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19845</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you came up with this compromise. Thumbs up. 
Good luck, on the knee.
-Bas-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you came up with this compromise. Thumbs up.<br />
Good luck, on the knee.<br />
-Bas-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke - AspiringGent</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19844</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke - AspiringGent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19844</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear about the injury.  Best of luck with the MRI.

I agree that the pricing in the whisky industry is getting out of control.  I wonder what the common whisky drinker as well as the media can do to have any influence on this.  Obviously if the market drops out on high-dollar whisky, this might have an impact, but while the perception remains that taste is directly correlated with price, this isn&#039;t going to happen.  Perhaps that&#039;s why I love that Jim Murray rates Alberta Premium rye so highly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear about the injury.  Best of luck with the MRI.</p>
<p>I agree that the pricing in the whisky industry is getting out of control.  I wonder what the common whisky drinker as well as the media can do to have any influence on this.  Obviously if the market drops out on high-dollar whisky, this might have an impact, but while the perception remains that taste is directly correlated with price, this isn&#8217;t going to happen.  Perhaps that&#8217;s why I love that Jim Murray rates Alberta Premium rye so highly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19843</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19843</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

First of all, wishing you a speedy recovery. I think that you have found a nice middle ground with your approach. 

Slainte.

Louis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>First of all, wishing you a speedy recovery. I think that you have found a nice middle ground with your approach. </p>
<p>Slainte.</p>
<p>Louis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC Skinner</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19840</link>
		<dc:creator>JC Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19840</guid>
		<description>Really sorry to hear about your injury, John.
Hope you&#039;re on the mend ASAP.
I am curious as to why you committed to being guided by the readership on whether to review these whiskies, only to decide to ignore the decision offered pretty emphatically by the same readership, though.
While I for one appreciate your intention to at least compare them to more available and affordable bottlings, I suspect I&#039;m not alone in hoping that a rejection to review would send a strong message out to Diageo and other distillers that you stand alongside your readership in concern at their pricing and marketing policies as regards such releases.
Perhaps you&#039;re in some way obliged to review them, or at least feel so, having received the samples. That&#039;s understandable. 
But pace Alex above, this response makes me feel the readers actually weren&#039;t listened to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really sorry to hear about your injury, John.<br />
Hope you&#8217;re on the mend ASAP.<br />
I am curious as to why you committed to being guided by the readership on whether to review these whiskies, only to decide to ignore the decision offered pretty emphatically by the same readership, though.<br />
While I for one appreciate your intention to at least compare them to more available and affordable bottlings, I suspect I&#8217;m not alone in hoping that a rejection to review would send a strong message out to Diageo and other distillers that you stand alongside your readership in concern at their pricing and marketing policies as regards such releases.<br />
Perhaps you&#8217;re in some way obliged to review them, or at least feel so, having received the samples. That&#8217;s understandable.<br />
But pace Alex above, this response makes me feel the readers actually weren&#8217;t listened to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Riesbeck</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/03/08/the-verdict-on-reviewing-the-managers-choice-whisky-samples/#comment-19836</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Riesbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3987#comment-19836</guid>
		<description>Best of luck with the surgery.  Nothing like a little spring tune up eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best of luck with the surgery.  Nothing like a little spring tune up eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

