February 26th, 2010

Okay, now here’s what YOU can do.

John Hansell

Back here in January, I asked you what I could do to make WDJK better for you. Many of those recommendations I implemented. And I’m still working on the others.

Now, I would like to ask you to do something that will also benefit you. Tell more people about WDJK. The more whisky enthusiasts reading this blog, the better the conversation and intellectual discussions.

If you have whisky drinking friends, or if you belong to a whisky club, get them involved in WDJK. Give them the link. And it’s an easy one to remember. It’s www.whatdoesjohnknow.com.

Thanks!

Category: Administrative 25 Comments

February 26th, 2010

New bourbon: Old Crow Reserve

John Hansell

Here in Eastern Pennsylvania we got a lot of snow. (Again!) I just finished shoveling and snow blowing, and I getting in the mood for a whiskey. But what to start with this evening?

Problem solved! The folks at Beam Global just sent me a review bottle of the brand spanking new Old Crow Reserve, so this whiskey is first up this evening. And soon!

Freddie Noe tells me in a video that it’s four years old (the regular Old Crow is three) and will sell for $10-12, competing with the likes of Evan Williams. In the video, he’s drinking his on the rocks, but I’m going to have mine neat if you don’t mind, Freddie.

Formal review to follow soon. Have a great weekend everyone!

(P.S. Click on the picture of my “unprofessional” photo of the whiskey to get a closer image of it. And click on it again to zoom in even more.)

Category: Bourbon,New Releases Tags: , 14 Comments

February 26th, 2010

Review: Ridgemont Reserve 1792 bourbon

John Hansell

Ridgemont Reserve, 8 year old, 46.85%, $30
The last time I reviewed this whiskey was back in 2004, and this new bottling is an improvement. It’s beefier, thicker, and richer, with a good dose of rye spice. Very nice! Good balance of flavors on the nose and palate, with caramel custard, bright fruit (Clementine, golden raisin orange marmalade), a peppering of spice (fresh mint, warming cinnamon, dried vanilla), green tea, a hint of toasted marshmallow, and a pleasing dried oak, tobacco-tinged finish. Lots of character!

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 88

Category: Bourbon,Reviews Tags: 64 Comments

February 25th, 2010

Review: Arran “The Peacock”

John Hansell

Arran “The Peacock”, 1996 Vintage, 46%, £38
Complex, dynamic, and well-balanced. Honeyed vanilla, bright fruit (lemon, tangerine, nectarine), sultana, green grapes, and banana bread, peppered with ginger and subtle, gripping grape skin. Great mouth-feel (from the oak), which adds another dimension. That’s what 46% and no chill filtering will do for a whisky. One of the better Arran whiskies I’ve tasted. (Released in 2009. Sadly not available in the U.S., but worth finding!)

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 87

Category: Reviews,Scotch whisky Tags: 17 Comments

February 24th, 2010

A reminder of my rating scheme

John Hansell

Numbers don’t mean anything if they aren’t defined and put in perspective. A comment raised in my recent post here shows that I need to post my rating scheme, which you will find in Malt Advocate magazine. (The reviews here on WDJK essentially are advanced reviews of what will be published in Malt Advocate’s Buyer’s Guide.)

RATING SCHEME

95-100
A classic! All components are balanced appropriately, with the complexity and character expected in a classic.

90-94
Outstanding! One of the best for style. Distinctive.

80-89
Good to very good. Plenty of character and no identifiable flaws. Worth seeking out.

70-79
Average. No unique qualities. Flaws possible.

60-69
Below average. Major flaws. Avoid.

So, when I review a whisky, keep this rating scheme in mind. For example, when I give a whisky a rating in the low 80s, this doesn’t mean I don’t like it or think something is wrong with it.

Category: Opinions,Reviews 48 Comments

February 23rd, 2010

Distilled Spirits Council embraces craft distillers

John Hansell

I don’t usually talk about the business side of whiskey-making, but I thought this was worth mentioning. The Distilled Spirits Council is recognizing, and embracing, the efforts of craft distillers, which is nice to see (and well-deserved). They will now have a stronger, more unified voice, which I think will be beneficial to them. The details are below in the press release I just received.

Distilled Spirits Council Launches Craft Distiller

Membership for Small Producers

–Names Advisory Council Chaired by Anchor’s Fritz Maytag–

Washington, DC – The Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS) today announced a new Craft Distiller Affiliate Membership program designed to organize the growing number of small distilled spirits producers across the nation and alert them to public policy issues affecting the industry at every level of government.

In the last decade, the number of small distillers in the U.S. grew from a few dozen to more than two hundred today, now making an array of products from white spirits such as vodka and gin to wide varieties of liqueurs, aged whiskeys and brandies.

“The rapidly growing number of craft distillers in states across the nation represents an important grassroots base for communicating substantive messages about industry modernization, our strong marketing code and the important role distillers play in the hospitality industry,” said DISCUS President Peter Cressy. “Together, we can educate public officials and pursue positive policies that advance the interests of the hospitality industry and the jobs we create.”

The new membership group will be headed by an eleven member Advisory Council of distillers chaired by Fritz Maytag of San Francisco’s Anchor Distilling. As a leadership body, its role will be to coordinate communications with the DISCUS policy teams, and engage and activate small distillers in their respective regions.

Other members of the Advisory Council included: Scott Bush, Templeton Rye (IA); Robert Cassell, Philadelphia Distilling, (PA); Jess Graber, Stranahan’s Colorado Whiskey (CO); Ted Huber, Huber Starlight Distillery (IN); Brett Joyce, Rogue Spirits, (OR); Marko Karakasevic, Charbay Distillery (CA); Brian McKenzie, Finger Lakes Distilling (NY); Guy Rehorst, Great Lakes Distillery (WI); Jorg Rupf, St. George Spirits (CA); and Rick Wasmund, Copper Fox Distillery (VA).

“I have long believed it is critically important for distillers of all sizes to work together to highlight the important and positive role we play in our communities,” said Chairman Maytag. “With the support of DISCUS’ public policy experts, small distillers can help ensure fair and equitable treatment for distilled spirits at the federal, state and local levels.”

The new craft distiller membership will be offered to producers under 40,000 nine-liter cases annually. They will receive numerous benefits, including a compendium of State Laws and Regulations; legislative newsletters; action alerts; consultations with DISCUS legal and regulatory experts; opportunities to showcase products at DISCUS-sponsored tasting events; ability to participate in the annual gala “Spirit of Mount Vernon” event; access to the annual industry economic briefing; and ability to participate in DISPAC.  DISCUS will also organize an annual Public Affairs Conference on Capitol Hill in Washington featuring briefings, Congressional visits and a reception featuring their products. 

For more information, contact Frank Coleman at DISCUS: 202-682-8840

Category: Microdistilleries Tags: 9 Comments

February 23rd, 2010

Review: “Smokehead” single malt scotch

John Hansell

Smokehead, 43%, $55
Youthful, fiery, oozing with testosterone. Toffee apple, intoxicated with kiln-trapped peat smoke, charcoal ash, anise,  honeyed malt, brine, peppered seaweed, kippers, and damp earth. Brisk and warming. Okay, this is a young, “in your face” Islay single malt. Young Islay whiskies show the true character of Islay whiskies (which I like), and this is a young one. Ideally, I’d like to see another five years, not chill-filtered, and bottled at 46% ABV, but there’s still some sort of a “raw edge” attraction here.

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 82

Category: Reviews,Scotch whisky Tags: 36 Comments

February 22nd, 2010

More validation that blenders should taste the whiskeys they select and not just nose them.

John Hansell

I just spent time nosing and tasting American whiskey samples. I am consulting for a company that will be releasing a new whiskey in the near future.

I can’t go into detail (yet) on the what the whiskey will be, but one thing is (once again) perfectly clear. Some whiskeys have great aromas and can have serious flaws on the palate.

Given that a lot of whiskey blending and cask selection is done by nosing and not by tasting (out of necessity for some blenders working through a hundred or more samples in a morning), I think this potential disparity is significant–especially given that most drinkers care far more about how a whiskey tastes than how it smells.

Maybe this explains why some whiskeys aren’t as good as they could be? And, looking at it from a different perspective, I wonder how many really wonderful tasting whiskeys are passed over because their aromas are only mediocre?

Food (or should I say “whiskey”) for thought.

Category: Opinions 32 Comments

February 22nd, 2010

Jura Prophecy, Dalmore 18 yr. old heading to the U.S.

John Hansell

As you will see by the pictures here, this past week I received review samples of both Jura Prophecy and Dalmore 18. Here’s the information I have.

Both have recently been bottled and are on their way to the U.S., with distribution in the April/May time frame.  They will have national distribution. Prices: $70 for the Jura, $150 for the Dalmore.

I had a wee taste of both, and both are nice. I compared the Prophecy to Superstition (the other smoky Jura). Prophecy is smokier, richer, heavier, deeper. Yum! Formal reviews coming soon.

Category: New Releases,Scotch whisky Tags: , 14 Comments

February 22nd, 2010

Review: Glen Grant 10 and 16 yr. old single malts

John Hansell

Glen Grant, 10 year old, 43%, $45
Light (for a Speysider), floral, fresh and elegant, showing honeyed vanilla, lively fruit, along with a hint of marshmallow and hay. Soft, dry finish. Pleasant, straight-forward and uncomplicated. A good, clean, introductory malt that’s easy to embrace.

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Glen Grant, 16 year old, 43%, $80
Thicker and fruitier than the entry level 10 year old, with greater mouth-feel and a drier finish. Orchard fruit (especially pear), kiwi, lime, and creamy vanilla, with a suggestions of toasted coconut, hay and marshmallow. Dry, gently spicy finish. A bit more involved than the 10 yr old, but still with the same DNA. Very pleasant. (This is a new expression that made its debut in the U.S. last month.)

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 85

Category: New Releases,Reviews,Scotch whisky Tags: 9 Comments

Older Posts »


Whisky Advocate magazine is America's leading whisky magazine. It's the number one source for whisky information, education and entertainment for whisky enthusiasts.