January 17th, 2010

What’s your oldest bottle?

John Hansell

I’m referring to year of distillation, not necessarily age.

My oldest bottle was a pre-prohibition bottle of Old Taylor bourbon. I shared that bottle during one of my whiskey tastings. I also had a 1940 Gordon & MacPhail Glenlivet, which I also shared during one of my tastings.

I think the oldest one I still have is a 50 year old Dalmore which I purchased about 10 years ago during a charity auction. It was bottled in the 1970s, which would put the distillation back in the 1920s, or earlier.(Picture on left.)

How about you?

Category: Opinions,Whisky collections 65 Comments

January 17th, 2010

Review: Royal Lochnagar Selected Reserve

John Hansell

Royal Lochnagar Selected Reserve, 43%, $210
So nice to (finally) see this whisky available here in the U.S. again. A more mature, more sherried expression of the standard Royal Lochnagar. Rich, silky, and sweet, with molasses, nutty toffee, old demerara pot still rum, caramelized fig, marmalade, and juicy oak. More subtle notes of honeyed ginger, coffee grounds and tobacco leaf add complexity. A soothing post-prandial dram.

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 87

Category: Reviews,Scotch whisky,Uncategorized Tags: 10 Comments

January 15th, 2010

A few tidbits on Mackmyra whisky

John Hansell

Here’s some news we recently received from Lars Lindberger at Mackmyra distillery in Sweden. Their whiskies aren’t in the U.S. yet, but soon…

We’re bottling Mackmyra Whisky – The 1st Edition in one liter bottles with US labels right now (I don’t have any photos yet), and we are just about to close a deal with an importer. We visited New York a couple of times last year and met stores, restaurants etc. There seems to be great interest for our product.

I talked to our sales manager and, according to him, it’s more likely that the bottles will get to the shelves in April or May, than in March. 

But there’s more happening at Mackmyra: We’re growing out of or current distillery and visiting facilities at Mackmyra bruk (Jim Murray wrote about it in Malt Advocate in 2002) and it’s time for something better and bigger.

In April our plans for the new distillery will be more concrete. Right now the plan is to start building June/July. The project is called Mackmyra Whiskyby (Mackmyra Whisky Village) and will contain a distillery built for visitors, other visitor facilities, warehouses, etc.

 

I’m looking forward to having their whiskies available here in the U.S.

Category: European whiskies,Uncategorized Tags: 6 Comments

January 15th, 2010

Review: Caol Ila 10 year old, unpeated (2009 release)

John Hansell

One more review of the new limited edition 2009 releases (coming to the U.S.). I like this whisky very much, but not enough to put it in the 90s. (Perhaps some of you may differ with me?)

Caol Ila “unpeated”, 10 year old, 65.8%, $60
Caol Ila makes unpeated whisky for blenders, but it rarely gets bottled as a single malt. Here’s a chance to find out what Caol Ila tastes like without the smoke. Very revealing. Good viscosity and rather sweet, showing thick honeyed vanilla, gobs of fruit (lemon drops, lime tart, ripe Bartlett pear, kiwi), mint jelly and cut grass. Its sea influence finally emerges towards the finish with emerging brine and just a hint of seaweed. Interesting: Bruichladdich and Bunnahabhain are now bottling peated whiskies, and Caol Ila does just the opposite. This is an interesting diversion, but I am missing the added dimension of peat smoke in this Caol Ila.

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 88

Category: Reviews,Scotch whisky Tags: 30 Comments

January 14th, 2010

Review: Lagavulin 12 year old (2009 release)

John Hansell

Still continuing with these very nice Diageo Special Release whiskies for 2009…

Lagavulin, 12 year old, 57.9%, $75
The aroma is tightly bound, but a little water releases it nicely. A powerful dram, with tarry, leafy, coal ash, caramel apple, driftwood, and even a little soapy (not necessarily a negative). More subtle floral notes (heather, lavender, violet), Earl Grey tea, and smoked fish.  Long, damp peat smoke, charcoal finish.

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 90

Category: Reviews,Scotch whisky Tags: 45 Comments

January 13th, 2010

New: Knappogue Castle 1994 Vintage Irish Whiskey

John Hansell

There’s a new Knappogue Castle Irish Whiskey hitting the shelves. This one is a 1994 vintage and it’s limited to 1,000 individually numbered, hand-signed bottles (by President Mark Andrews). Price: $100.

Interestingly, the back label says the whiskey is triple-distilled. Knappogue Castle bottles have historically come from either Cooley or Bushmills. If it is indeed triple-distilled, it would mean the latter, as Cooley whiskeys are double-distilled.

I was just doing some more digging. A 15 year old was released in the fall of 2008, and that one was from Cooley, as it consisted of whiskeys from the “Cooley” era (1990-1992 vintage releases). You can see my review of it here. That one cost $100 too.

This new one, being a 1994 vintage, would put it smack in the middle of the Bushmills era (1993-1995 vintage releases), confirming the back label’s assertion that it is triple-distilled. You can see my “secret decoder ring” post on Knappogue Castle whiskey here. Apparently, they held some of the Bushmills whiskey back for additional aging, just like they did with the Cooley whiskeys for the 15 year old bottling.

I will be getting a review sample. I’ll let you know my thoughts.

Category: Irish whiskey,New Releases Tags: 18 Comments

January 12th, 2010

How many whiskies I have. And why.

John Hansell

I promised in my post yesterday that, if I got 150 people to confess how many whiskies they have, I would do the same. In actuality, we’re already over 200. So, here goes.

For those of you who are only interested in the numbers and don’t care about the “why” part, here they are:

Single malt scotch: 834
Straight whiskey (bourbon, rye, wheat): 286
Irish whiskey: 99
Blended scotch, blended malts, grain whisky: 46
Canadian whisky: 33
Japanese whisky: 15
Miscellaneous artisan (e.g. micro) distillery whisky: 13

I have too many whisky samples (50 ml-200ml) to count and track (hundreds), so I am excluding them here.

If my math is correct, that’s 1,326 bottles. 466 of these bottles are open. Regarding the ones that are open, all the bottles are at least 1/4-1/3 full. I have a policy that, when my bottle gets down to that level, I either give it away to someone who’s going to drink it or I invite friends over and we drink the bottle together.

I am an equal-opportunity drinker. I also love wine (168 bottles kept in a wine cellar), drink more beer than anything (have two beers on tap and over a hundred bottles in a beer cellar–a lot of Belgian and Belgian-style), and have dozens of bottles of rum, tequila, cognac and Armagnac.

Now, I’d like to address the “why” part of my whisky inventory.

First, let me say that, in all honesty, I would rather not have this many bottles of whisky. When I tell you how many bottles I have, I am not bragging. I’m actually quite embarrassed by it. (Kids, don’t try this at home. :) ). If it weren’t for my job, I would have only a fraction of these whiskies.

How does one accumulate this many whiskies? (It really is more of an accumulation rather than a collection. I don’t believe in collections. Whisky is for drinking.) Well, it all started innocently enough, just like most of you. Except I got a head start.

When I first got turned on to single malts back in the late 1980s and early 1990s, whisky tastings and whisky festivals didn’t exist. And the restaurants around where I live didn’t have much to offer. So, when I traveled on business (as a scientist at the time) I would go to specialty whisky shops and just buy the whiskies (with MJ’s Complete Guide To Single Malt Scotch in my hand), hoping that I would like them. Fortunately, the prices at that time were not as bad a they are now. (And I was also fortunate that sometimes I had people like Joe C. at Sam’s Wines & Spirits at the time who let me sample whiskies at his shop.)

I wanted to try as many whiskies as possible, so I bought as many as I could afford (without upsetting the wife too much ). Three bottles led to 30 bottles, and that’s when I started getting the “hairy eye ball” from my wife and that’s the first time I ever heard her utter the phrase “OCD” to me. :) ) . Parlaying my passion into a legitimate business is the only thing that allowed me to justify buying more whiskies. It was for research…

It was–and still is–my intention to have zero bottles of whisky left when I die.  (I will need some help from friends, of course.) You see, one day, about ten years ago, I sat down and did the math. At the rate that I was drinking whisky, there was no way that I was going to finish my stash of whisky even if I lived beyond 80 years old. (I didn’t want to be one of those people who die with a large stash of whisky that shows up at some auction somewhere.) And that’s the day I practically stopped buying whisky. I can count on two hands how many bottles of whisky I have purchased in the past decade. I only buy one or two bottles a year. They are usually whiskies that I like that I can’t get here in the U.S. (For 2009, I bought two bottles of whisky.)

My job actually puts a “double whammy” on the amount of whisky I currently have and continue to accumulate. First, I get review samples. Realize, that I get samples of most every whisky that comes into the U.S. (much more than I actually review formally) in addition to whiskies that aren’t imported here. Second, by the time I am done tasting and reviewing whisky, usually the last thing I want is another whisky. (Thus, the reason why I have all the other booze to drink–especially beer.) So, as long as I am doing what I do for a living, I will be accumulating whisky.

Still, I do try to do my best to keep the whiskies to a manageable level. For the whiskies I don’t need–or no longer need–professionally, I use them at the whisky tastings I host. (Like the one I have in Philly the first week of March.) I also donate bottles to many charity events. And, I promise you that all of my local friends never go thirsty for whisky. :)

So, without going into the specifics of which whiskies I have, which ones mean the most to me, etc. (I’ll save that for a different post), I hope this gives you a general idea of what I have. And why.

Category: Opinions,Whisky collections 71 Comments

January 12th, 2010

Ardbeg Supernova: a regular item or just a one-time release?

John Hansell

Strangely enough, the answer to both questions is “no”!

I heard it from a little bird (a very important little bird who knows about these things) that Ardbeg Supernova will most likely be an “occasional” release, depending on suitable stock (i.e., having enough whisky with a peating level that high).

And, since I know you’re going to ask, I might just come out and say it: yes, there WILL be a 2010 release of Ardbeg Supernova. Now, if that isn’t good news for the day, I don’t know what is.

Thank you, little bird. Stop by again soon.

Category: New Releases,Scotch whisky Tags: 66 Comments

January 11th, 2010

Be honest: How many bottles of whisky do you have?

John Hansell

Many of you already acknowledged your obsession. So, How many bottles of whisky do you have? You can tell us how many are opened and unopened if you want to.

There’s no wrong answers here, and we promise not to tell anybody (especially your spouses). So don’t be a chicken!

If I get 100 150 confessions, I’ll tell you how many I have. It’s all inventoried. (Yes, I upped the ante to 150. I underestimated you!)

A thought: maybe the one with the most whiskies can donate a bottle to the one with the fewest whiskies?

Category: Opinions 251 Comments

January 11th, 2010

Why the obsession with whisky?

John Hansell

I’m reading through your New Year’s resolutions, and there’s a common theme throughout most of them:

“My resolution is to regain my sanity and not spend so much on whisky…”

“My Whisky-based-resolution is more or less the same as it was last year–stop buying impulsively.”

“Measure my drams more carefully to control portions size.”

“Mine is to stop buying more whiskey than I can drink. And since I have stocks to last me a lifetime, I shouldn’t be buying much more at all anymore.”

“I spent too much on whisky this year. So much so that my wife gave me some sideways glances. Not good.”

“My resolutions will be to stop buying impulsively.”

“More will power and buy less”

“My only whisky resolution this year is to control spending. I went back and added up what I spent on Scotch in 2009 and would be ashamed to tell anyone the result.”

” To not give in to impulsive buying, particularly out of fear of missing out on some limited special.”

“It is scary to realize how much I have spent on whiskey in 2009.Yikes!!”

Gosh, one would think that you’re talking about crack cocaine, not whisky! The comments go on and on. This is just a small portion of them.

So, let me ask you. Why are we like this? What is it that drives us to buy more whisky (and spend more money on whisky) than we want to?

Category: Opinions 46 Comments

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »


Whisky Advocate magazine is America's leading whisky magazine. It's the number one source for whisky information, education and entertainment for whisky enthusiasts.