<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 16th Annual Malt Advocate Whisky Awards to be announced HERE first, beginning February 1st</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 16th Annual Malt Advocate Whisky Awards: an overview &#124; What Does John Know?</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16683</link>
		<dc:creator>The 16th Annual Malt Advocate Whisky Awards: an overview &#124; What Does John Know?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16683</guid>
		<description>[...] read about the schedule of the awards, and our reasoning for publishing the awards via this blog, here. Each day, from February 1st-11th, I will post up the award at 0700 Eastern [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read about the schedule of the awards, and our reasoning for publishing the awards via this blog, here. Each day, from February 1st-11th, I will post up the award at 0700 Eastern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16328</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16328</guid>
		<description>Nice categories overall John - looking forward to the results.  Hope NYC ended up well for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice categories overall John &#8211; looking forward to the results.  Hope NYC ended up well for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16322</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16322</guid>
		<description>February is like Whisk(e)y Chanukah! A different gift every day. (OK I know it isn&#039;t exactly the same, but work with me people).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>February is like Whisk(e)y Chanukah! A different gift every day. (OK I know it isn&#8217;t exactly the same, but work with me people).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red_Arremer</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16136</link>
		<dc:creator>Red_Arremer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16136</guid>
		<description>MrTH, the more real and relevant award concept you&#039;re talking about would be a significant improvement. Of course that&#039;s not going to happen this year. So, just to be glib: aren&#039;t you kind of falling in line with me-- aren&#039;t you taking the problems with the awards as an opportunity simply to focus attention on how things really are in the state of whisky and possibly on how they might be improved. Just to be glib ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MrTH, the more real and relevant award concept you&#8217;re talking about would be a significant improvement. Of course that&#8217;s not going to happen this year. So, just to be glib: aren&#8217;t you kind of falling in line with me&#8211; aren&#8217;t you taking the problems with the awards as an opportunity simply to focus attention on how things really are in the state of whisky and possibly on how they might be improved. Just to be glib <img src='http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawschooldrunk</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16085</link>
		<dc:creator>lawschooldrunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16085</guid>
		<description>looking forward...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looking forward&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrTH</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16066</link>
		<dc:creator>MrTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16066</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s reassuring to hear that if there isn&#039;t a suitable candidate in the category, then there simply is no winner.

Red, I agree generally that awards are &quot;pretty lame&quot;, but my reaction is, I think, quite opposite to yours.  Frankly, I don&#039;t pay much attention to awards at all because I don&#039;t really think they&#039;re relevant to anything I care about.  (One reason I let my sub to That Other Magazine lapse is because it seemed like every other issue was an awards issue of some kind...just seems like cheap filler to me.)  What I meant was to survey the field for whoever you think is worthy of recognition, for whatever reason, and give them an award for whatever it is they&#039;ve done to deserve it, rather than trying to create more pigeonholes for more awards (Best Peated Coastal North Highlander From A Warehouse Not Directly On The Foreshore With Six To Nine Months Of Finishing In A Hungarian Wine Cask, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s reassuring to hear that if there isn&#8217;t a suitable candidate in the category, then there simply is no winner.</p>
<p>Red, I agree generally that awards are &#8220;pretty lame&#8221;, but my reaction is, I think, quite opposite to yours.  Frankly, I don&#8217;t pay much attention to awards at all because I don&#8217;t really think they&#8217;re relevant to anything I care about.  (One reason I let my sub to That Other Magazine lapse is because it seemed like every other issue was an awards issue of some kind&#8230;just seems like cheap filler to me.)  What I meant was to survey the field for whoever you think is worthy of recognition, for whatever reason, and give them an award for whatever it is they&#8217;ve done to deserve it, rather than trying to create more pigeonholes for more awards (Best Peated Coastal North Highlander From A Warehouse Not Directly On The Foreshore With Six To Nine Months Of Finishing In A Hungarian Wine Cask, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16055</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16055</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you caught that Red. It actually should say &quot;Single Malt...&quot;. I fixed it. A blend of malts (aka vatted malts) go under the blend category. Good eye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you caught that Red. It actually should say &#8220;Single Malt&#8230;&#8221;. I fixed it. A blend of malts (aka vatted malts) go under the blend category. Good eye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16054</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16054</guid>
		<description>Red, it&#039;s possible that we might expand the Scotch whisky category, because of the number of whiskies being released. We add categories very methodically and with great consideration, though. We don&#039;t like the whole &quot;give everybody an award&quot; concept that is very pervasive in other publications and award contests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red, it&#8217;s possible that we might expand the Scotch whisky category, because of the number of whiskies being released. We add categories very methodically and with great consideration, though. We don&#8217;t like the whole &#8220;give everybody an award&#8221; concept that is very pervasive in other publications and award contests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16053</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16053</guid>
		<description>Mr TH, I&#039;m  glad you brought that up. We actually DO have a World Whisky Award category but we are not using it right now. It&#039;s for all the whiskies produced outside the above categories. Problem is, our requirement is that the whisky must be sold in the US. There are very few distilleries imported to the US from the other countries right now. (Penderyn and Amrut are the main ones.) 

But, next year we will see many others imported (Nikka, Mackmyra, Sullivans Cove, etc.,) so we will implement that category for 2010 releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr TH, I&#8217;m  glad you brought that up. We actually DO have a World Whisky Award category but we are not using it right now. It&#8217;s for all the whiskies produced outside the above categories. Problem is, our requirement is that the whisky must be sold in the US. There are very few distilleries imported to the US from the other countries right now. (Penderyn and Amrut are the main ones.) </p>
<p>But, next year we will see many others imported (Nikka, Mackmyra, Sullivans Cove, etc.,) so we will implement that category for 2010 releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red_Arremer</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16048</link>
		<dc:creator>Red_Arremer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16048</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s cool that it&#039;s &quot;malt scotch&quot; whisky, John. Kinda of like saying that compass box is officially in the running against single malts.

Another thought though, along the lines of examining the categories? how about a best single cask whisky-- no category specified: so it could be bourbon, scotch, japanese, whatever... just a recognition of something that worked best without being modified in any way after coming out of the barrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s cool that it&#8217;s &#8220;malt scotch&#8221; whisky, John. Kinda of like saying that compass box is officially in the running against single malts.</p>
<p>Another thought though, along the lines of examining the categories? how about a best single cask whisky&#8211; no category specified: so it could be bourbon, scotch, japanese, whatever&#8230; just a recognition of something that worked best without being modified in any way after coming out of the barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red_Arremer</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16045</link>
		<dc:creator>Red_Arremer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16045</guid>
		<description>As far as &quot;categories being tailored to recognize the deserving&quot; etc.-- that&#039;s a tough one MrTH and I feel where you&#039;re coming from. It is lame that a not so hot whiskey can get recognition just because it happens to be in a category of things that are even more underwhelming than it. But as long as your analyzing things, you might as well admit that the whole idea of awards is pretty lame period. I mean the best scotch whisky last year? Who does John think he&#039;s kidding, right? Shouldn&#039;t there be separate awards for peated vs sherried, etc. the whole thing is bogus... one could go on forever in this direction.

But perhaps some comfort can be found in the understanding that the sense of injustice in whisky awards or music awards is a microcosm as well as a product of the paradoxical impossibility of sincerely adressing both a broad public and a particular individual at the same time... or perhaps not.

John, is too smart not to understand this. He knows that ultimately, the value of his awards depends not simply on how much prestige they confer, but on how people engage with them. One of the main values of whisky awards is in the critical impulse that they provoke.

All that said, my personal critical impulse is pretty close to yours-- it&#039;s crazy that there should be an equal number of awards available for canadian whisky and malt scotch. Though I see tons of potential in all of the categories, at present, scotch whisky has more stylistic diversity than all of the rest put together. And these different styles appeal to different people, each group of whom might be very interested John&#039;s opinion about the best product in that category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as &#8220;categories being tailored to recognize the deserving&#8221; etc.&#8211; that&#8217;s a tough one MrTH and I feel where you&#8217;re coming from. It is lame that a not so hot whiskey can get recognition just because it happens to be in a category of things that are even more underwhelming than it. But as long as your analyzing things, you might as well admit that the whole idea of awards is pretty lame period. I mean the best scotch whisky last year? Who does John think he&#8217;s kidding, right? Shouldn&#8217;t there be separate awards for peated vs sherried, etc. the whole thing is bogus&#8230; one could go on forever in this direction.</p>
<p>But perhaps some comfort can be found in the understanding that the sense of injustice in whisky awards or music awards is a microcosm as well as a product of the paradoxical impossibility of sincerely adressing both a broad public and a particular individual at the same time&#8230; or perhaps not.</p>
<p>John, is too smart not to understand this. He knows that ultimately, the value of his awards depends not simply on how much prestige they confer, but on how people engage with them. One of the main values of whisky awards is in the critical impulse that they provoke.</p>
<p>All that said, my personal critical impulse is pretty close to yours&#8211; it&#8217;s crazy that there should be an equal number of awards available for canadian whisky and malt scotch. Though I see tons of potential in all of the categories, at present, scotch whisky has more stylistic diversity than all of the rest put together. And these different styles appeal to different people, each group of whom might be very interested John&#8217;s opinion about the best product in that category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Cretacci</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16037</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cretacci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16037</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to it.  Less award makes each one that more special. Always interested in the  &quot;Top Ten New Whiskies&quot; list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to it.  Less award makes each one that more special. Always interested in the  &#8220;Top Ten New Whiskies&#8221; list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16026</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16026</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be very interested in the &quot;Best Irish&quot; verdict...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be very interested in the &#8220;Best Irish&#8221; verdict&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrTH</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16012</link>
		<dc:creator>MrTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16012</guid>
		<description>John, awards and magazine awards issues usually leave me cold, but I like your categories--unlike Guillermo (and with respect), I think less is more.  The only thing missing, maybe, is &quot;world&quot; whiskies (as opposed to unworld whiskies?).  Actually, I&#039;d prefer to see the categories tailored to recognize the deserving, rather than trying to spot a gold medal for each pigeonhole. Nevertheless, I look forward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, awards and magazine awards issues usually leave me cold, but I like your categories&#8211;unlike Guillermo (and with respect), I think less is more.  The only thing missing, maybe, is &#8220;world&#8221; whiskies (as opposed to unworld whiskies?).  Actually, I&#8217;d prefer to see the categories tailored to recognize the deserving, rather than trying to spot a gold medal for each pigeonhole. Nevertheless, I look forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWC</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2010/01/22/16th-annual-malt-advocate-whisky-awards-to-be-announced-here-first-beginning-february-1st/#comment-16000</link>
		<dc:creator>JWC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatdoesjohnknow.com/?p=3278#comment-16000</guid>
		<description>john, i respect your opinion and reviews a lot - i&#039;m really looking forward to the award list.  the best thing about putting it online like you said is time.  if it was sold in 2009, there may be a whisk(e)y or two on your list that i may still find on the shelf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john, i respect your opinion and reviews a lot &#8211; i&#8217;m really looking forward to the award list.  the best thing about putting it online like you said is time.  if it was sold in 2009, there may be a whisk(e)y or two on your list that i may still find on the shelf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

