<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Old Rip Van Winkle Family Selection 23 yr. old</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13437</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13437</guid>
		<description>Scott, it looks nice! Thanks for posting the pic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, it looks nice! Thanks for posting the pic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13432</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13432</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the wait, my access at home has been really bad past week. Here is the pic of the Pappy 23 in our display case:

http://i45.tinypic.com/zkqvyx.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the wait, my access at home has been really bad past week. Here is the pic of the Pappy 23 in our display case:</p>
<p><a href="http://i45.tinypic.com/zkqvyx.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i45.tinypic.com/zkqvyx.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13384</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13384</guid>
		<description>If this is just some marketing gimmick (which I doubt it is) they&#039;ve hit me hook, line &amp; sinker. I will definitely be grabbing one, if not two, of these...  I have long wished that the 23 year was higher in proof and now I&#039;ve got it, along with anice nox, decanter &amp; glasses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is just some marketing gimmick (which I doubt it is) they&#8217;ve hit me hook, line &amp; sinker. I will definitely be grabbing one, if not two, of these&#8230;  I have long wished that the 23 year was higher in proof and now I&#8217;ve got it, along with anice nox, decanter &amp; glasses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blog #53: The Definitive Guide to Christmas Whisky Shopping &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13249</link>
		<dc:creator>Best in Blog #53: The Definitive Guide to Christmas Whisky Shopping &#124; Whisky Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13249</guid>
		<description>[...] On the bourbon front, John Hansell talks about this innovative new wheated bourbon finished off in a rye cask. He also gives a 95 rating to Old Rip Van Winkle Family Selection 23 year old. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the bourbon front, John Hansell talks about this innovative new wheated bourbon finished off in a rye cask. He also gives a 95 rating to Old Rip Van Winkle Family Selection 23 year old. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13238</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13238</guid>
		<description>Thanks Scott!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Scott!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13237</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13237</guid>
		<description>We just got in our only set of this and up close it is very impressive. (I&#039;ll post some pics tonight when I get home... can&#039;t do it from work.) Glencairne glassware looks very nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just got in our only set of this and up close it is very impressive. (I&#8217;ll post some pics tonight when I get home&#8230; can&#8217;t do it from work.) Glencairne glassware looks very nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff H.</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13210</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13210</guid>
		<description>sam - I guess you could say the same about, say, a Laphroaig 10. I certainly get plenty of aroma from that when drinking out of a tumbler. Problem is, it seems to only be part of the aroma, not the full story.

It sure seems like a tapered top helps bring together all of the elements better. Maybe it&#039;s all in my head, though.

Cheers,
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sam &#8211; I guess you could say the same about, say, a Laphroaig 10. I certainly get plenty of aroma from that when drinking out of a tumbler. Problem is, it seems to only be part of the aroma, not the full story.</p>
<p>It sure seems like a tapered top helps bring together all of the elements better. Maybe it&#8217;s all in my head, though.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam k</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13204</link>
		<dc:creator>sam k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13204</guid>
		<description>Jeff H, I have no argument with twenty-three year old, 114 proof bourbon being served in wider-mouth glasses.  Lighter single malts might need the concentration, sure, but there&#039;s plenty of aroma to be enjoyed regardless of serving vessel with a big bourbon like this.

Julian wouldn&#039;t lead you astray!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff H, I have no argument with twenty-three year old, 114 proof bourbon being served in wider-mouth glasses.  Lighter single malts might need the concentration, sure, but there&#8217;s plenty of aroma to be enjoyed regardless of serving vessel with a big bourbon like this.</p>
<p>Julian wouldn&#8217;t lead you astray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13186</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13186</guid>
		<description>sku, I think your Port Ellen/Brora analogy is a good one. Yes, there&#039;s bling. But this is a piece of history (coming from the old Stitzel-Weller distiller), and very high quality too. 

One thing I know for sure: If I found this under my Christmas tree later this month, I would not be complaining to Santa.

And regarding the side-by-side comparison with the standard 23 year old , I did that twice and it was very interesting. I wouldn&#039;t say the flavor profile was identical, but certainly closely related. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sku, I think your Port Ellen/Brora analogy is a good one. Yes, there&#8217;s bling. But this is a piece of history (coming from the old Stitzel-Weller distiller), and very high quality too. </p>
<p>One thing I know for sure: If I found this under my Christmas tree later this month, I would not be complaining to Santa.</p>
<p>And regarding the side-by-side comparison with the standard 23 year old , I did that twice and it was very interesting. I wouldn&#8217;t say the flavor profile was identical, but certainly closely related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13180</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13180</guid>
		<description>What a sad world it would be if all whisky came in a standard tall round and how miserable it would be for the uneducated consumer who goes in for a bottle at Christmas. It would be like to trying to pick a quality mid priced claret back in the early 90&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a sad world it would be if all whisky came in a standard tall round and how miserable it would be for the uneducated consumer who goes in for a bottle at Christmas. It would be like to trying to pick a quality mid priced claret back in the early 90&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff H.</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13177</guid>
		<description>I know I&#039;m not supposed to be swayed by the fancy packaging, but knowing that there&#039;s great whiskey inside, I sure wouldn&#039;t mind having that decanter.

As for the glasses...old-fashioned style tumblers? Really? Maybe that&#039;s just the bourbon way, but I&#039;d like to at least see a tapered opening. I mean, for $350, you&#039;re going to want to get the most out of all facets of the drinking experience, including the nose. 

I suppose they&#039;re nice looking, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;m not supposed to be swayed by the fancy packaging, but knowing that there&#8217;s great whiskey inside, I sure wouldn&#8217;t mind having that decanter.</p>
<p>As for the glasses&#8230;old-fashioned style tumblers? Really? Maybe that&#8217;s just the bourbon way, but I&#8217;d like to at least see a tapered opening. I mean, for $350, you&#8217;re going to want to get the most out of all facets of the drinking experience, including the nose. </p>
<p>I suppose they&#8217;re nice looking, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sku</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13172</link>
		<dc:creator>sku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13172</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve read, this is a 23 year old Bourbon from Stitzel-Weller stocks, hand picked by Julian Van Winkle.  That makes it the equivalent of a Brora or Port Ellen - - rare and collectible, but also a distillery known for good whiskey.  Given those comparisons, I think it&#039;s hard to complain too much about the price here, though yes, they have added some bling.  

It&#039;s a big bonus that  you can get some Pappy 23 for much less, and I&#039;d love to do a side by side tasting of the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve read, this is a 23 year old Bourbon from Stitzel-Weller stocks, hand picked by Julian Van Winkle.  That makes it the equivalent of a Brora or Port Ellen &#8211; - rare and collectible, but also a distillery known for good whiskey.  Given those comparisons, I think it&#8217;s hard to complain too much about the price here, though yes, they have added some bling.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a big bonus that  you can get some Pappy 23 for much less, and I&#8217;d love to do a side by side tasting of the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWC</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13170</link>
		<dc:creator>JWC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13170</guid>
		<description>john, so far, buffalo trace has been very good to its customers and it has generated a ton of goodwill - they haven&#039;t been pulling the same stuff as the scotch distillers (perhaps bc it being bourbon, they&#039;re not in a position to do so).  i know the pappy&#039;s are being made by bt - it would have been great if they had come out with this whiskey without all the doo-dads but i doubt people would have paid extra over the other 23 yr old.  as a matter of fact, around houston, the 15 yr olds sold out asap, the 20 yr olds - only a few left.  the 23 yr olds - still sitting on the shelves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john, so far, buffalo trace has been very good to its customers and it has generated a ton of goodwill &#8211; they haven&#8217;t been pulling the same stuff as the scotch distillers (perhaps bc it being bourbon, they&#8217;re not in a position to do so).  i know the pappy&#8217;s are being made by bt &#8211; it would have been great if they had come out with this whiskey without all the doo-dads but i doubt people would have paid extra over the other 23 yr old.  as a matter of fact, around houston, the 15 yr olds sold out asap, the 20 yr olds &#8211; only a few left.  the 23 yr olds &#8211; still sitting on the shelves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13162</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13162</guid>
		<description>JWC, the proof is higher, so you&#039;re getting a little more. But, you have to ask if the glasses, decanter, and box are worth the extra price. Some will agree, some won&#039;t. Some will see the extra expense being a waste. Others will look at the decanter and glasses and say, &quot;these will make a nice FUNCTIONAL memory of a great whiskey after the whiskey is gone.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JWC, the proof is higher, so you&#8217;re getting a little more. But, you have to ask if the glasses, decanter, and box are worth the extra price. Some will agree, some won&#8217;t. Some will see the extra expense being a waste. Others will look at the decanter and glasses and say, &#8220;these will make a nice FUNCTIONAL memory of a great whiskey after the whiskey is gone.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWC</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2009/12/08/review-old-rip-van-winkle-family-selection-23-yr-old/#comment-13161</link>
		<dc:creator>JWC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/?p=2831#comment-13161</guid>
		<description>john, let&#039;s be honest, besides the box, decanter and glasses, is there ANY difference to justify the price difference between this and the &quot;other&quot; 23 yr old pappy?  when i heard about this, my first thought was:  oh no, american bourbon makers are trying to copy the marketing crap of the scotch distillers.

the special johnnie walker blues (astronomically priced) fell flat - i guess that&#039;s why the pappy is only $130 more than the &quot;regular&quot; 23 yr old pappy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john, let&#8217;s be honest, besides the box, decanter and glasses, is there ANY difference to justify the price difference between this and the &#8220;other&#8221; 23 yr old pappy?  when i heard about this, my first thought was:  oh no, american bourbon makers are trying to copy the marketing crap of the scotch distillers.</p>
<p>the special johnnie walker blues (astronomically priced) fell flat &#8211; i guess that&#8217;s why the pappy is only $130 more than the &#8220;regular&#8221; 23 yr old pappy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

