September 18th, 2009

Every once in a while, a pleasant surprise (Irish whiskey review included)

John Hansell

Slane CastleSo, unsolicited, today I recieve a bottle of blended Irish whiskey called “Slane Castle.” Metal screw top, picture of a castle on the label, no age statement, and 40% ABV. I never heard of this. As expected, the back label says it was distilled at Cooley (being the only independent Irish distillery and the distillery where most private Irish whiskey labels come from.)

Sure, I know that Cooley has made some delicious blended whiskeys lately,but still…I am always a little wary of “branded” whiskeys. You never know who’s deciding what goes in the bottles.  Let me tell you: what a pleasant surprise! And at a very affordable price. You want a value whiskey? Here’s one. My formal review follows.
 
Slane Castle Irish whiskey, 40%, $23
Great malt flavor for a blend–and creamy–with honeyed vanilla, soothing caramel, lively summer fruits, golden raisin,  subtle date, and butter cookie. Well-balanced, very clean with no harshness, and very drinkable!

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 80

According to my contact, here’s the scoop on availability:

The product only landed in the US in July.  We have begun the distribution process, but it coincided with the Constellation brand shuffle, which has slowed many of my wholesalers down.  I will begin broad based sales in January, and I am “spot starting” in MA, SC, CT, FL and IL.

Because it is scarce right now, I am going to provide her contact information. Maybe she can give you more information on availability. Her name is Anne Zamitalo, and her email address is: azamitalo@capstone-international.com.

If you like Irish whiskey, here’s one to track down. And at this price, you can stock up. The picture shows it on the rocks, but I was enjoying sipping it neat.

Category: Irish whiskey,New Releases,Reviews Tags: 9 Comments

September 17th, 2009

Details on the new Macallan Lalique 57 year old

John Hansell

This is the third in a series. The previous two were a 50 year old expression and a 55 year old expression. (As you can see by my review, I was a little underwhelmed by the 55 year old, when compared to other 50-plus year old Macallans I’ve tasted.)

Here’s the information I was just given on this whisky:

It’s the second oldest vintage bottling ever by Macallan

It consists of two casks. The first cask is an American Oak sherry butt. The second cask, a Spanish Oak sherry butt, is actually an amalgamation of three other sherry butts (1949, 1951 and 1952 vintages).

It’s being bottled at 48.5%. 400 bottles total (72 for the U.S.). Price: $15,000.

Category: New Releases,Scotch whisky 4 Comments

September 17th, 2009

Two new Highland Park vintages (1964, 1968)

John Hansell

This fall, Highland Park will be introducing two new vintage: 1964 and 1968. This is the beginning of ONGOING Highland Park vintage releases (not in any sequential vintage order).

I have the details on both, which I’m including below.

1964
Consists of only two casks, refill hogsheads. Bottled at 42.3%.  290 bottles. Price: £3,750

1968
Consists of eight refill casks (7 hogsheads, 1 sherry butt). Bottled at 45.8%. 1550 bottles. Price: £2,250

As of now, the 1964 vintage will NOT becoming to the U.S. Both of these whiskies will be available for tasting at the Charity table at WhiskyFest New York in November, for a small donation to charity.

There will also be a 50 year old Highland Park released in 2010. This, too, will be an ongoing release, not a one-time deal. (I believe that will be the only ongoing 50 year old release that I know about.)

Start saving your pennies.

Category: Charity,New Releases,Scotch whisky Tags: 14 Comments

September 16th, 2009

Bill Lumsden talks Glenmorangie

John Hansell

In addition to Bill talking about Ardbeg, he also made a few comments about Glenmorangie when I was with him the other day. Here are some tidbits of information he gave me (largely based on your questions):

Glenmorangie Sonnalta (PX Sherry finish), currently in Travel Retail, is coming to the US in January. There will also be a new Sauternes Finish in 2010. The new Sauternes Glenmorangie will be a “beefed up” version of the existing one.

The prime age for Glenmorangie?: 10-12y/o. Generally speaking, according to Bill. I have a tendency to agree with him. I love Astar, and the 10 y/o, IMHO, is a benchmark whisky for that age.

Ardbeg bottlings will vary more than Glenmorangie because vatting sizes are smaller.

I asked Bill Lumsden what’s new for Glenmorangie. He hinted at “an older style” of Glenmorangie. I’m just guessing here but maybe it’s the front-end of production process? With the barley? Maybe a lightly peated Glenmorangie? The opposite of what Blasda was for Ardbeg?

Category: Scotch whisky 7 Comments

September 16th, 2009

Review: the new Laphroaig 18 yr. old

John Hansell

I know some of you have already expressed your thoughts here on this whisky. I think it is a departure from the 15 year old it replaces in some ways. I like both, BTW, but for different reasons.

For those of you who have tried both, what do YOU think?

 

Laphroaig 18Laphroaig, 18 year old, 48%, $90
Very smooth for Laphroaig—the extra aging has mellowed this whisky. Soothing honeyed malt, creamy vanilla and toffee provide a bed for peat smoke, charcoal, tar, along with more subtle brine, smoked seaweed, anise, ginger and citrus. A, gentler, creamier, more tactile,  less medicinal Laphroaig when compared to some of its siblings (Cask Strength, 15 year old, 25 year old, and even Quarter Cask). Will you prefer the new 18 year old to the 15 year old it is replacing? That depends. I enjoy the balance and subtle complexity of flavors with the 15 year old, but I also like the enhanced richness, mouth-coating creaminess of the 18 year old. The higher strength (and no chill-filtering) of the 18 is certainly a bonus. (Side note: I know this is a moot point now, but I would like to have seen the 15 year old bottled at 48%, rather than 43%.)

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 90

Category: New Releases,Reviews,Scotch whisky 33 Comments

September 15th, 2009

Bill Lumsden answers your Ardbeg questions

John Hansell

Bill Lumsden pictureIf you’ve been following my blog postings (or following me on Twitter),  you know I met with Dr. Bill Lumsden yesterday. (Picture is from yesterday.) He’s the genius behind all the new Ardbeg and Glenmorangie creations. We were together for a good part of the morning.

Below are some of the interesting tidbits he told me about Ardbeg, largely based on the questions you wanted me to ask him. (They are in bite-sized chunks because I posted them up in Twitter yesterday.) Tomorrow I’ll post up some of the answers to the Glenmorangie questions I asked him. 

Oh, and by the way, on Thursday, I’ll be sharing with you somenew  information on Highland Park and Macallan. Stay tuned.

So here are the short tidbits from Bill yesterday:

Did you know “Blasda” is essentially a younger “Kildalton” (i.e very low peating level)?  The original Kildalton was from 1980 and 24 y/o-ish. They started making new “Kildalton” & bottled it young and called it Blasda (7 y/o).

There are a couple new Ardbegs coming out in next year or two. Hint: think about remaining stocks from the 1970s.

The new Ardbeg Corryvrecken is a different batch than “Committee” bottling. Committee bottling was aged in more 1st fill French oak: more “leathery bite” as Bill describes it. This whisky was “cut with” first fill and refill bourbon casks.

Ardbeg is cutting back on single cask bottlings worldwide. It’s going to be just for Committee bottlings, Islay whisky fest & at the distillery.

Approximately 80% of Ardbeg whisky is stored on Islay, 20% on mainland. Many casks transerred over to mainland @ 9yrs old for eventual bottling. So, in this regard, they are aged in both locations for a period of time. Bill noted that there are heavy maturation loses in the volume of whisky in the casks on Islay. They will be building new warehouses on Islay and will be studying this very carefully.

Ardbeg Rennaissance was a one-time bottling. Bill’s hope is to make design all the Ardbeg 10 year old bottlings after Rennaisance. (Not at cask strength, but the same type of  quality wood–1st fill bourbon casks.)

Ardbeg bottlings will vary more than Glenmorangie because vatting sizes are smaller.

Prime age for Ardbeg? Generally speaking, 15-17 years old. (Bill really liked the original 17 year old bottling.)

Bills says they have casks from the 1970s still, but most of the hold stock “inherited” has been bottled. However, I got the impression he might also have something from the 1960s. He wouldn’t confirm nor deny.

He also mentioned that they have bought back casks from blenders (and other private owners) for their bottlings, like other distilleries have done.

Update: I also asked Bill the difference between the pre- and post-Glenmorangie produced Ardbeg 10 year old.  His response: they’re trying to reproduce the same style but with improvements. What improvements? Mainly with the quality of the wood. He also noted that it was a challenge reproducing the same style because they are no longer malting their own barley at the distillery, and this effects the flavor of the whisky.

Category: Scotch whisky Tags: 12 Comments

September 14th, 2009

Great meeting today with Bill Lumsden (Glenmorangie, Ardbeg)

John Hansell

Bill Lumsden is the brain behind the new Glenmorangie and Ardbeg bottlings. I met with him today. Great meeting. I got most of your questions answered. I’m tied up until later on Tuesday (Malt Advocate staff meeting all day tomorrow), but I’ll post up what he told me by the end of the day on Tuesday.

Category: Scotch whisky No Comments

September 14th, 2009

Live Twitter review for this week: The new Laphroaig 18 yr. old

John Hansell

For those of you who are interested, I’ll be reviewing the new Laphroaig 18 year old this Wednesday, September 16th, @4pm live on Twitter. I’ll be comparing it to the other Laphroaig expressions (10, Cask Strength, 15, Quarter Cask, 25, 30, etc.).

If you want to, follow along (http://twitter.com/JohnHansell). I’ll be sticking around to answer questions afterwards. If you can’t make it, no worries. I’ll post up my review here soon thereafter.

Category: New Releases,Reviews,Scotch whisky Tags: 5 Comments

September 13th, 2009

I made some enhancements to WDJK

John Hansell

I was speaking with a brand manager the other day who told me that he liked my blog.  But, because of his busy travel schedule, he only gets to look at it once every few (or several) days.

Until today, I only had my 10 most recent blog postings viewable without having to search for them. Realizing that I sometimes go blog crazy (like I did on Friday with five posting), I could easily reach 10 blog postings in a few days.

So, I increased the number of viewable posts to 15 (both in the main body, and with the listings in the right-hand margin). This way, if you are traveling on business or go on vacation for a few days, you can come back here and easily get caught up on everything you missed. It also makes it easier for you to go back and check previous blog postings for comment updates.

Speaking of previous blog comment updates, I also added a “Recent Comments” listing on the right margin. (Scroll down  a ways until you find it.) This allows you to view the 15 most recent comments, who commented, and the blog posting they commented on. Again, I’m doing this so you can go back and get caught up on threads that interest you.

I hope these improvements helps. Let me know what you think. And let me know if there’s anything else I can do to make my site here more appealing to you.

Category: Administrative 3 Comments

September 13th, 2009

Is the Scotch whisky industry in decline?

John Hansell

This recent article in The Herald, quoting industry “insiders” (the Scotch Whisky Association), suggests it isn’t.

Your thoughts?

Category: Media,Opinions,Scotch whisky Tags: 12 Comments

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »


Whisky Advocate magazine is America's leading whisky magazine. It's the number one source for whisky information, education and entertainment for whisky enthusiasts.