February 4th, 2009

Review: Ardbeg Supernova

John Hansell

Here’s my review of the new Ardbeg Supernova made from 100+ ppm phenol barley. A sample of Bruichladdich’s similarly ultra-peated Octomore is on it’s way to me. A review of this whisky will follow shortly after I get it.

Ardbeg Supernova, 58.9%, $130
Identifiably richer, fuller, and smokier on the nose when compared to other young Ardbegs. While still prominent, there’s slightly less brine and seaweed, more earthiness, tar, soot, espresso, tobacco, grass, and chocolate fudge. The same goes for the palate. It starts out like a “slightly more gutsy than normal” cask strength, young Ardbeg (e.g., Renaissance) and, if you go into this experience expecting to be totally blown away by peat, tar and smoke, you might feel a bit under-challenged initially. But the peat eventually builds to a powerful, lava-like crescendo and you eventually realize that this is no ordinary Ardbeg. The length of the finish is seemingly endless, bold and warming. Through all this, there’s a soft underbelly of ripe barley and a vanilla sweetness to balance at least some of the tar, heat, and smoke–something I admire in many Ardbegs.

Bottom line: It’s an interesting, entertaining, and eye-opening experience. I like how mature it tastes for a relatively young whisky. But, like a whisky that shows just a bit too much sherry or oak, I think the extra peat, to a degree, masks the subtle complexities I admire in some other, lesser peated Ardbegs, which is the only thing keeping me from scoring this whisky in the 90s. All smoky whisky enthusiasts should endeavor to try this at least once.

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 89

Category: New Releases,Reviews,Scotch whisky 29 Comments

February 3rd, 2009

Ardbeg Supernova review tomorrow (Wednesday)

John Hansell

I got a review sample of the new Ardbeg Supernova today. But it is very much winter here in Pennsyvania and my sample was delivered very cold. So, I will let it calm down and return to room temperature before I review it on Wednesday. Expect a posting by early evening, EST. 

Category: New Releases,Reviews,Scotch whisky 4 Comments

February 3rd, 2009

Review: Port Ellen 29 year old

John Hansell

This whisky was recently released about the same time as the Brora 25 year old, which I reviewed here two days ago.

Port Ellen, 29 year old, 55.3%, $400
An elder Port Ellen, but still showing plenty of Port Ellen character. It’s chock full of kiln smoke, damp forest bed, seaweed, charcoal, brine, and tar. Additional notes of licorice root, kalamata olive, cinnamon, and black pepper, with teasing citrus emerging occasionally. Warming, tarry, dry smoke finish. An old-fashioned, pungent style of Islay whisky.

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 89

Category: Reviews,Scotch whisky 6 Comments

February 2nd, 2009

Hello LA Times: Jack Daniel’s isn’t a bourbon!

John Hansell

Education is key to helping consumers select a whiskey they will enjoy. It’s going to be hard to teach the average whiskey drinker the difference between the various whiskey categories so they can make intelligent, informed decisions if we have major print publications getting it wrong. 

Saturday’s LA Times discusses how “liquor” sales are slumping, with the exception of whiskey. “Sales of bourbons such as Jack Daniels and Maker’s Mark are bucking a slump in demand for distilled spirits…” the article goes on to say. You can read the whole story here.

This isn’t the first time this has happened, and it won’t be the last. I’ve blogged about misleading articles several times over the past year. Some of the other ones were far worse, but I think that perhaps the biggest misconception in the whiskey industry is that Jack Daniel’s is a bourbon.

(For those of you lurking who don’t know the difference, Jack Daniel’s is a Tennessee whiskey. So is George Dickel. They undergo on additional step beyond bourbon–the spirit is charcoal “mellowed” through vats of sugar maple charcoal before being put into barrels for aging. They taste different than bourbon.)

This shows that we still have a long way to go educating the mainstream press who have so much influence on the consumer because what they write is read by so many people.

Category: Media,Opinions,Tennessee whiskey 29 Comments

February 1st, 2009

Review: Brora 25 year old

John Hansell

Here’s my thoughts on Diageo’s newest limited edition Brora. Next up: the most recent Port Ellen.

Brora, 25 year old, 56.3%, $350
Quite lively for 25 years, with layers of bright fruit (lemon, nectarine, grapefruit, pineapple) on a bed of vanilla and honey. There’s a peppering of dried spice, smoldering ember, and beach pebbles. Lightly smoky, dried spice finish. Very nice. Brora enthusiasts will not be disappointed, but the prices the whisky from this shuttered distillery are creeping up.

Advanced Malt Advocate magazine rating: 91

Category: Reviews,Scotch whisky 5 Comments

« Newer Posts


Whisky Advocate magazine is America's leading whisky magazine. It's the number one source for whisky information, education and entertainment for whisky enthusiasts.