<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Macallan and naked women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:43:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Macallan announces next installment of &#8220;Masters of Photography&#8221; series &#124; What Does John Know?</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-25591</link>
		<dc:creator>The Macallan announces next installment of &#8220;Masters of Photography&#8221; series &#124; What Does John Know?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 13:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-25591</guid>
		<description>[...] might remember the first time Macallan did this. I wrote about it here back in 2008. It involved a well-known photographer, a beautiful naked blond on the distillery [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] might remember the first time Macallan did this. I wrote about it here back in 2008. It involved a well-known photographer, a beautiful naked blond on the distillery [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JON</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>JON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>WOW-IT&#039;S REFRESHING TO READ SOME NO B S TRUTH !  THANKS MEN AND LADY !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW-IT&#8217;S REFRESHING TO READ SOME NO B S TRUTH !  THANKS MEN AND LADY !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kallaskander</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2211</link>
		<dc:creator>kallaskander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2211</guid>
		<description>Hello John,

according to this

http://www.fineexpressions.co.uk/news/2008%20Sep-Dec/macallan_rankin_partnership.html

Macallan spends £1.3 million on this limited edition.

Why?

I must say that I find the actions of Macallan and their owners Edrington Group more and more disconcerting.

Meaning I like what they do less and less. And that goes for their whiskies, too.

What irks me the most is the mass production they are implementing with reopening a production line build in the 1960ies and closed in the 1990ies which will boost the capacity of Macallan from 6 to 8 million litres.
But will quality be able to keep in step with such quantity?

The signs I see and tasted seem to say: No!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello John,</p>
<p>according to this</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fineexpressions.co.uk/news/2008%20Sep-Dec/macallan_rankin_partnership.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fineexpressions.co.uk/news/2008%20Sep-Dec/macallan_rankin_partnership.html</a></p>
<p>Macallan spends £1.3 million on this limited edition.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>I must say that I find the actions of Macallan and their owners Edrington Group more and more disconcerting.</p>
<p>Meaning I like what they do less and less. And that goes for their whiskies, too.</p>
<p>What irks me the most is the mass production they are implementing with reopening a production line build in the 1960ies and closed in the 1990ies which will boost the capacity of Macallan from 6 to 8 million litres.<br />
But will quality be able to keep in step with such quantity?</p>
<p>The signs I see and tasted seem to say: No!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Fry</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>LSD: as large vattings of chillfiltered/diluted whisky go,
i think Macallan is justifiably proud of their product.  the
problem is they think it&#039;s worth far more than i do. when
you put the traditional packaging foolishness (expensive
has to look expensive) together with this warp the curve
(if it costs more it must be better) marketing strategy, it
seems you end up with just this sort of malarkey.  when
legitimate producers begin believing the transcendental 
monkeybusiness generated by their ad men, the actual
down to earth value of the stuff they make tends to get
lost in the shuffle.  

maybe the time has come for a system where there are
two seperate regimes: one for the drinkers and drinking
collectors &amp; the other for those whose primary concerns
are for other (than what&#039;s inside the bottle) things.  

in a way we&#039;re already there.  then, again, maybe not.
as long as our media&#039;s attention to the high end things
most of us will never get a taste of (much less buy) has
the very real effect of keeping from us (even minimal)
information on the myriad lesser lights that increasingly
populate (there&#039;s still a boom on) our larger markets,
i guess we&#039;ll just have to try and make believe there
really is a whisk(e)y heaven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LSD: as large vattings of chillfiltered/diluted whisky go,<br />
i think Macallan is justifiably proud of their product.  the<br />
problem is they think it&#8217;s worth far more than i do. when<br />
you put the traditional packaging foolishness (expensive<br />
has to look expensive) together with this warp the curve<br />
(if it costs more it must be better) marketing strategy, it<br />
seems you end up with just this sort of malarkey.  when<br />
legitimate producers begin believing the transcendental<br />
monkeybusiness generated by their ad men, the actual<br />
down to earth value of the stuff they make tends to get<br />
lost in the shuffle.  </p>
<p>maybe the time has come for a system where there are<br />
two seperate regimes: one for the drinkers and drinking<br />
collectors &amp; the other for those whose primary concerns<br />
are for other (than what&#8217;s inside the bottle) things.  </p>
<p>in a way we&#8217;re already there.  then, again, maybe not.<br />
as long as our media&#8217;s attention to the high end things<br />
most of us will never get a taste of (much less buy) has<br />
the very real effect of keeping from us (even minimal)<br />
information on the myriad lesser lights that increasingly<br />
populate (there&#8217;s still a boom on) our larger markets,<br />
i guess we&#8217;ll just have to try and make believe there<br />
really is a whisk(e)y heaven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawschooldrunk</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2196</link>
		<dc:creator>lawschooldrunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2196</guid>
		<description>you know, I&#039;m sure mark reynier thought of something like this, but at least he has enough sense not to carry through with it.  

their million different bottlings, though, are another story...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, I&#8217;m sure mark reynier thought of something like this, but at least he has enough sense not to carry through with it.  </p>
<p>their million different bottlings, though, are another story&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawschooldrunk</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>lawschooldrunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>I see how this marketing project fuses nicely with their &quot;grow a tree for every bottle&quot; project or whatever.  What The...?


give me a break...macallan is sub-par for my palate and no naked woman is going to change that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see how this marketing project fuses nicely with their &#8220;grow a tree for every bottle&#8221; project or whatever.  What The&#8230;?</p>
<p>give me a break&#8230;macallan is sub-par for my palate and no naked woman is going to change that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whisky girl</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>whisky girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding? A naked woman and shots of the distillery? How does this make ANY SENSE??? What does a woman with NO CLOTHES ON have to do with whisky? 

If this makes any sense (which it doesn&#039;t), where are the naked men???? This is a totally sexist project and I&#039;m really DISAPPOINTED in The Macallan. Pathetic. Really freaking pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding? A naked woman and shots of the distillery? How does this make ANY SENSE??? What does a woman with NO CLOTHES ON have to do with whisky? </p>
<p>If this makes any sense (which it doesn&#8217;t), where are the naked men???? This is a totally sexist project and I&#8217;m really DISAPPOINTED in The Macallan. Pathetic. Really freaking pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Fry</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2182</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 03:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2182</guid>
		<description>all great fun  for those of us who would RATHER have our whisk(e)y WITHOUT all the costly/wasteful FRILLS, this is just another wart in the full-tilt EXCESS that could help the industry to the inevitable BUST, maybe sooner than we would&#039;ve thought notso long ago.  

just my speculation  i betcha if they offered ANY of these hifaloot&#039;n&#039;goodies BOTH with &amp; w/o the superfluities (subtracting
even half of the increased packaging cost) they&#039;d sell a whole lot more of the bare bones versions to real whisk(e)y drinkers, real drinker/collectors &amp; maybe even to a few of the &#039;other&#039; collectors too.  if they even experimented with something like this, they&#039;d definitely boost their image with a bunch of us backbenchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all great fun  for those of us who would RATHER have our whisk(e)y WITHOUT all the costly/wasteful FRILLS, this is just another wart in the full-tilt EXCESS that could help the industry to the inevitable BUST, maybe sooner than we would&#8217;ve thought notso long ago.  </p>
<p>just my speculation  i betcha if they offered ANY of these hifaloot&#8217;n'goodies BOTH with &amp; w/o the superfluities (subtracting<br />
even half of the increased packaging cost) they&#8217;d sell a whole lot more of the bare bones versions to real whisk(e)y drinkers, real drinker/collectors &amp; maybe even to a few of the &#8216;other&#8217; collectors too.  if they even experimented with something like this, they&#8217;d definitely boost their image with a bunch of us backbenchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>Gosh, I didn&#039;t see the movie. I have to go and check that out. For research purposes, naturally.

No, I don&#039;t think my wife Amy knows about this one yet. She has my blog on her RSS feed, so it&#039;s only a matter of time, I fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, I didn&#8217;t see the movie. I have to go and check that out. For research purposes, naturally.</p>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t think my wife Amy knows about this one yet. She has my blog on her RSS feed, so it&#8217;s only a matter of time, I fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>John - I got the press release/email as well. There is a movie of the photo shoot attached to the site.

...and another thing --- does Amy know about your &#039;work&#039;??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; I got the press release/email as well. There is a movie of the photo shoot attached to the site.</p>
<p>&#8230;and another thing &#8212; does Amy know about your &#8216;work&#8217;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2171</guid>
		<description>Yes indeed! Not a bad job if you can get it! :)

It would be even better if I could have tagged along with the photographer while he was at the Distillery!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed! Not a bad job if you can get it! <img src='http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It would be even better if I could have tagged along with the photographer while he was at the Distillery!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/11/14/the-macallan-and-naked-women/#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>So, let me get this straight. Now, in addition to tasting whisky, you can also browse nude photos and call it work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, let me get this straight. Now, in addition to tasting whisky, you can also browse nude photos and call it work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

