<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Four Roses &#8220;Mariage&#8221; Collection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:16:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>Scotty, I will be posting my review of this whiskey in the very near future and will have more information on it at that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scotty, I will be posting my review of this whiskey in the very near future and will have more information on it at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>Scotty, I tasted the Mariage again last night (for the second time) and my opinion is similar to yours. It&#039;s rather sweet and fruity, but very soft and elegant. A very enjoyable, if tame, Four Roses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scotty, I tasted the Mariage again last night (for the second time) and my opinion is similar to yours. It&#8217;s rather sweet and fruity, but very soft and elegant. A very enjoyable, if tame, Four Roses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s in my glass right now.  Very nice.  A touch sweeter than my normal drinks.  Light nose, pleasant but a bit alcoholish.  Can&#039;t give all the tasing notes right now since I&#039;m having some chips as an accompanyment.  Based on the dram earlier this evening, I&#039;ll give it an 8.5 out of 10.  (My absolute 10 being the 16yo A.H.Hirsh.)  I think I paid $64 for it at Liquor Barn on Man O&#039; War in Lexington, KY.  One of my favourite aspects of the Mariage is the hefty stopper.  Geez, milled from a billet of aluminium???  Not quite, but a keeper none the less.  This year&#039;s 15yo Pappy Van Winkle - of similar strength - which, by the by, gets ex-catholic nuns drunk rather proficiently, is ultimatly a more satisfying bourbon.  But that&#039;s about $30 more.   Bottoms Up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s in my glass right now.  Very nice.  A touch sweeter than my normal drinks.  Light nose, pleasant but a bit alcoholish.  Can&#8217;t give all the tasing notes right now since I&#8217;m having some chips as an accompanyment.  Based on the dram earlier this evening, I&#8217;ll give it an 8.5 out of 10.  (My absolute 10 being the 16yo A.H.Hirsh.)  I think I paid $64 for it at Liquor Barn on Man O&#8217; War in Lexington, KY.  One of my favourite aspects of the Mariage is the hefty stopper.  Geez, milled from a billet of aluminium???  Not quite, but a keeper none the less.  This year&#8217;s 15yo Pappy Van Winkle &#8211; of similar strength &#8211; which, by the by, gets ex-catholic nuns drunk rather proficiently, is ultimatly a more satisfying bourbon.  But that&#8217;s about $30 more.   Bottoms Up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t ask, but I don&#039;t expect the price to be out of the ordinary. (Let&#039;s hope not, anyway.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t ask, but I don&#8217;t expect the price to be out of the ordinary. (Let&#8217;s hope not, anyway.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam k</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>sam k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/09/10/new-four-roses-mariage-collection/#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>Another creative idea from 4R!  Since I seem to be hung up on the subject lately, any idea what the price will be, John?  I have been consistently pleased with Four Roses&#039; quality and affordability since they &quot;let that tiger out of the cage a few years back.&quot;  Looking forward to this experience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another creative idea from 4R!  Since I seem to be hung up on the subject lately, any idea what the price will be, John?  I have been consistently pleased with Four Roses&#8217; quality and affordability since they &#8220;let that tiger out of the cage a few years back.&#8221;  Looking forward to this experience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

