<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speyside visit update: The Macallan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 09:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>Ewan, yes it is a very good whisky for the price. --  John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewan, yes it is a very good whisky for the price. &#8212;  John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 05:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Confirmed on the Mac Cask Strength availability in the US Louis, I have seen it the past month on both coasts and the heartland - and in both old and new packaging (buff vs shiny box).  Best Macallan for the lower end of the price range, I would certainly take the Cask Strength over any of the Fine Oaks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confirmed on the Mac Cask Strength availability in the US Louis, I have seen it the past month on both coasts and the heartland &#8211; and in both old and new packaging (buff vs shiny box).  Best Macallan for the lower end of the price range, I would certainly take the Cask Strength over any of the Fine Oaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hansell</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/#comment-770</guid>
		<description>It was a special visit, that&#039;s for sure.

As far as I know, it is still being bottled. I believe I asked that question and they said &quot;yes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a special visit, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
<p>As far as I know, it is still being bottled. I believe I asked that question and they said &#8220;yes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Perlman</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Perlman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maltadvocate.com/2008/05/08/speyside-visit-update-the-macallan/#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Hi John, 

That was certainly one of the best distillery visits on record. But WRT a less lofty dram, do you know if the Macallan Cask Strength is still being bottled?

Slainte.

Louis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John, </p>
<p>That was certainly one of the best distillery visits on record. But WRT a less lofty dram, do you know if the Macallan Cask Strength is still being bottled?</p>
<p>Slainte.</p>
<p>Louis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

